1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199901)16:1<35::aid-mar3>3.3.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products

Abstract: Affective and cognitive responses to a product trial are examined in an experiment containing two cells representing two product types: hedonic and functional. The stimulus products were a computer game and grammar-checking software. Forty-two college students comprised the sample for the experiment. The specific affective responses studied are pleasure and arousal, and brand cognitions are represented as the expectancy value from brand attributes (the product of brand beliefs, belief confidence, and attribute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
194
4
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
194
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…And although many of these results are preliminary, it is, for instance, considered a relevant finding that prior frustration may hamper the relationship between a consumer and a brand with regard to the users' acceptance of a future design, but it does not cause actual rejection. The relations between the dimensions of product meaning and emotion were also consistent with the results of previous research (e.g., Kempf, 1999) even though it is conceivable that their discovery in the current study was partly favored by the way the research was designed (i.e., through the selection of participants that score in very disparate ways on the respective dimensions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…And although many of these results are preliminary, it is, for instance, considered a relevant finding that prior frustration may hamper the relationship between a consumer and a brand with regard to the users' acceptance of a future design, but it does not cause actual rejection. The relations between the dimensions of product meaning and emotion were also consistent with the results of previous research (e.g., Kempf, 1999) even though it is conceivable that their discovery in the current study was partly favored by the way the research was designed (i.e., through the selection of participants that score in very disparate ways on the respective dimensions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Chebat et al (1995) examined the influence of affect on perception of service quality in a bank and also found that the higher the level of pleasure, the higher the level of perceived service quality in personnel's empathy and assurance. Kempf (1999) investigated the role of affect in the evaluation of hedonic product trials and found that affective responses, such as pleasure and arousal, were significant antecedents of the participants' evaluations of the trial experience. When these research results are applied to the context of price discounts for apparel products, consumers who have greater positive affect aroused by a price discount are expected to perceive higher product quality.…”
Section: Affect and Perceived Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer behavior research shows that reliance on affective or cognitive information may vary by product type. Kempf (1999) argues that consumers evaluate utilitarian products using cognitive criteria, whereas consumers evaluate hedonic products on the basis of affective reactions. Consequently, the appeal type's suitability (i.e., rational appeal for utilitarian services and emotional appeal for hedonic services) might explain how service-based CSR initiatives affect consumers.…”
Section: Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%