2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes and behavior in social space: Public good interventions based on shared representations and environmental influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eco-feedback strategy was applied in the form of anti-littering labels applied to disposable coffee cups in both conspicuous (experiment 1a) and inconspicuous forms (experiment 1b). The scripting strategy was applied in several forms, namely reusability (experiment 2a), reclosability (experiment 2b) and 'top of mindness', which aims at making it less likely for consumers to forget to clean up a package 20 (experiment 3). Experiment 1a with conspicuous labels and experiment 2a with reclosable packaging were previously published as a conference paper.…”
Section: Purpose Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eco-feedback strategy was applied in the form of anti-littering labels applied to disposable coffee cups in both conspicuous (experiment 1a) and inconspicuous forms (experiment 1b). The scripting strategy was applied in several forms, namely reusability (experiment 2a), reclosability (experiment 2b) and 'top of mindness', which aims at making it less likely for consumers to forget to clean up a package 20 (experiment 3). Experiment 1a with conspicuous labels and experiment 2a with reclosable packaging were previously published as a conference paper.…”
Section: Purpose Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other causes also include poor packaging design of commercial products, amount of litter already present at a particular site, presence and wording of signs referring to litter, and the number and/or placement and appearance of waste collection bins at the site (Kapoor, 2001;Somerville et al, 2003;Hasan, 2004;Gray and Gray, 2004;Santos et al, 2005a). Similarly, an array of socio-economic factors can affect public attitude towards littering, frequency of littering, and the effective approaches to hinder the littering tendency within an individual (Willoughby et al, 1997;Santos et al, 2005b;Liu and Sibley, 2004;Arafat et al, 2007;Storrier and McGlashan, 2006). These factors are region-and culture-dependent, and it is very important to study them if an effective littering-prevention program is to be designed (Liu and Sibley, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an array of socio-economic factors can affect public attitude towards littering, frequency of littering, and the effective approaches to hinder the littering tendency within an individual (Willoughby et al, 1997;Santos et al, 2005b;Liu and Sibley, 2004;Arafat et al, 2007;Storrier and McGlashan, 2006). These factors are region-and culture-dependent, and it is very important to study them if an effective littering-prevention program is to be designed (Liu and Sibley, 2004). To get a better comprehension of the complexity of street litter problems, integration between socio-economic and environmental studies is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sense of place (Jorgensen and Stedman 2001;Relph 1976) The relationship between the dimensions of sense of place and identification with a place and preference to stay as moderated by adult versus adolescents Piaget and Inhelder's (1967) spatial reasoning stages to mapping landscapes that is adapted by Hart and Moore (1973) where three stages in the development of spatial representation in children is defined. It has been proposed that map forms differ based on cultural context (Taylor and Tversky 1992 Liu and Sibley (2004) Theory of reasoned action (Fishbein and Ajzen 1975) The relationship between attitude and behavior moderated by shared representations. Kaplan (1989).…”
Section: Baird Harder and Preis (1997)mentioning
confidence: 99%