2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes and expectations of beef farmers in Austria, Germany and Italy towards the Welfare Quality® assessment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirchner et al . () conducted interviews with 90 beef farmers in Austria, Germany ( n = 31) and Italy to gather information on farmers’ willingness to join an animal‐based welfare assessment system such as Welfare Quality ® . They found that German farmers consider it important to benefit their animals and they therefore generally favour FAW assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirchner et al . () conducted interviews with 90 beef farmers in Austria, Germany ( n = 31) and Italy to gather information on farmers’ willingness to join an animal‐based welfare assessment system such as Welfare Quality ® . They found that German farmers consider it important to benefit their animals and they therefore generally favour FAW assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding general attitudes towards animal welfare, Hansson and Lagerkvist [19], found that farmers gave the most importance to non-use values of FAW when they have an animal centered attitude. Other studies observed a similar trend, however, to be willing to implement changes in management and housing, or to increase the workload and even investment to improve FAW, farmers stressed the importance of a financial return [82]. Furthermore, financial considerations were key determinants for the FAW decision-making process, although this created emotional distress for farmers.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other studies have similarly found how farmers applying health and welfare plans adopted significant measures to meet what they considered to be animal health. Sixty-eight percent of German beef cattle farmers interviewed expected personal and "non-monetary" benefits from their practices [82]. Bock et al [48] provided a deeper understanding of the factors that influence HAR and showed that Brazilian farmers in all sectors (beef, dairy, pig, and poultry) felt responsible for taking good care of their animals and they perceived good farming as a key element of their job satisfaction.…”
Section: Non-use Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations