1982
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(19820108)19:1<78::aid-pits2310190115>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes and learning disabilities: A literature review for school psychologists

Abstract: Most LD students spend the major part of the school day within the regular classroom. Research, however, supports the rejected status of these students. The purpose of this presentation is to: (a) review research pertaining to the feelings professionals and peers have about learning disabled students, and (b) review those factors that may be important for consideration when attempting to modify these perceptions. School psychologists should address the attitudinal issues with a knowledge and basic conceptualiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a!. 1979;Leyser and Gottleib, 1980;Horne, 1982). Some encouraging results have been reported from studies of cross-age, reverse role and peer tutoring, reflected in enhanced self-esteem and academic progress for LD student tutors and their tutees (Osguthorpe et.…”
Section: Curricular Responses To An Ld Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…a!. 1979;Leyser and Gottleib, 1980;Horne, 1982). Some encouraging results have been reported from studies of cross-age, reverse role and peer tutoring, reflected in enhanced self-esteem and academic progress for LD student tutors and their tutees (Osguthorpe et.…”
Section: Curricular Responses To An Ld Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Poor peer relationships may be influenced by common myths and misunderstandings regarding ADHD, which may enhance the stigma associated with this disorder, decrease the probability of peers interacting with students with ADHD, and decrease the quality of these interactions (Ellison, 2003; Furnham & Gibbs, 1984; Ingersoll & Goldstein, 1993; Richard & Russell, 2002; Roberts & Smith, 1999; Voeltz, 1980). Therefore, interventions targeting peers' attitudes and disability awareness may reduce the negative social impact of ADHD and enhance peers' acceptance of classmates with ADHD (Horne, 1982; Mrug, Hoza, & Gerdes, 2001; Royal & Roberts, 1987; Voeltz, 1980).…”
Section: Summary and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%