PsycEXTRA Dataset 1956
DOI: 10.1037/e488572008-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes as adjustments to stimulus, background, and residual factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradictory evidence has been presented regarding the impact of college on student attitudes and values (Jacob, 1957;Lehmann & Dressel, 1963;Newcomb, 1943;Webster, 1958). At the same time, data have indicated that from the freshman to senior years changes in attitudes and values will occur (Jacob, 1957;Lehmann & Dressel, 1963;Newcomb, 1943;Plant, 1962;Webster, Freedman, & Heist, 1962), but that the degree and extent to which attitudes and values are modifiable depend upon the nature of the experience (Smith, 1955), the type and nature of contact (McGuigan, 1958), the personality makeup of the individual (Helson, Blake, Mouton, & Olmstead, 1956), the group's approval of new attitudes (Rosenberg, 1956), and the subject's perception of the outcome (Carlson, 1956). Although the importance of the college climate in changing attitudes and values of college students is apparent in the works of Eddy (1957Eddy ( , 1959, Brown andBystrym (1962), Lazure (1959), and Newcomb (1962), it has been found to be nearly impossible to single out any one factor as being responsible for college students' attitudes and value changes (Lehmann & Payne, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory evidence has been presented regarding the impact of college on student attitudes and values (Jacob, 1957;Lehmann & Dressel, 1963;Newcomb, 1943;Webster, 1958). At the same time, data have indicated that from the freshman to senior years changes in attitudes and values will occur (Jacob, 1957;Lehmann & Dressel, 1963;Newcomb, 1943;Plant, 1962;Webster, Freedman, & Heist, 1962), but that the degree and extent to which attitudes and values are modifiable depend upon the nature of the experience (Smith, 1955), the type and nature of contact (McGuigan, 1958), the personality makeup of the individual (Helson, Blake, Mouton, & Olmstead, 1956), the group's approval of new attitudes (Rosenberg, 1956), and the subject's perception of the outcome (Carlson, 1956). Although the importance of the college climate in changing attitudes and values of college students is apparent in the works of Eddy (1957Eddy ( , 1959, Brown andBystrym (1962), Lazure (1959), and Newcomb (1962), it has been found to be nearly impossible to single out any one factor as being responsible for college students' attitudes and value changes (Lehmann & Payne, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory evidence has been presented regarding the impact of college on student attitudes and values (Jacob, 1958;Newcomb, 1943;Webster, 1958). At the same time, data have indicated that from the freshman to senior years, changes in attitudes and values will occur (Newcomb, 1943;Webster, 1958), but that the degree and extent to which attitudes and values are modifiable depend upon the nature of the experience (Smith, 1955), the type and nature of the contact (McGuigan, 1958), the personality make-up of the individual (Nelson, Blake, Morton, & Olmstead, 1956), the group's approval of new attitudes (Rosenberg, 1956), and the subject's perception of the outcome (Carlson, 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n the present experiment, as in certain studies by Helson and associates (Helson, Blake, Mouton & Olmstead, 1956;Helson, Dworkin & Michels, 1956), the shifts in the scale of judgements cannot be attributed to a specifiable change in physiological state or level of functioning which has been a direct function of excitation. The fact that the same standard against the same background produced only a shift in height judgements in one subject and only a shift in lightness judgements in another cannot readily be explained in terms of electrochemical states of the visual mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%