2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australia dietitians regarding dietary supplements: A cross-sectional survey

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
26
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study on the efficacy of the DS emphasised on the safety of DS; 60% of them responded with a neutral result whereby, 17% and 23% responded agree and disagree, respectively. When asked about the effectiveness of DS; similar trends found with 51% stating they were neutral (Marx, Kiss, McKavanagh, & Isenring, 2016).…”
Section: Efficacy Of the Supplementssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Another study on the efficacy of the DS emphasised on the safety of DS; 60% of them responded with a neutral result whereby, 17% and 23% responded agree and disagree, respectively. When asked about the effectiveness of DS; similar trends found with 51% stating they were neutral (Marx, Kiss, McKavanagh, & Isenring, 2016).…”
Section: Efficacy Of the Supplementssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Some supplement users may or may not experience the adverse effect of supplement intake. The usage of dietary supplement may result in several effects when the consumption achieves to some extent, and the effect may be hypertension, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, ill, and more (Marx et al, 2016). In Japan, most of the consumers tend to do nothing when they are experiencing an adverse effect of supplement intake (Kobayashi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Adverse Effect: Experience and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous surveys, a large proportion of the population regularly uses DSs such as multivitamins and fish oil to help manage chronic conditions (e.g. arthritis, osteoporosis and heart health) (Marx et al, 2016), while FFs are mainly used to improve the general conditions of the body, for example, pre-and probiotics, or decrease the risk of some diseases, that is, cholesterol-lowering products (Sir o et al, 2008). Our findings indicate that the main reasons for the use of both DSs and FFs mentioned by a majority of Czech respondents were stress relief, followed by digestive care and immunity boosting.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Consumers' Decision Tomentioning
confidence: 99%