1986
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2337(1986)12:3<155::aid-ab2480120302>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes concerning nuclear war in finland and in the united states

Abstract: Four hundred seventy residents of Ridgewood, New Jersey, and 493 residents of Jyväskylä, Finland, were randomly selected and interviewed about their attitudes concerning nuclear war. In both areas, a high proportion of the samples believed that some kind of nuclear incident is likely in the next decade. The vast majority stated that a nuclear war could not be won and that they expected to die in the event of war. About three fourths in both communities seldom discuss nuclear issues with anyone including their … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the first half of the decade, antinuclear activists constituted a rather small portion of the United States population; a good estimate seems to be 10% (Fuld & Nevin, 1988), although significantly higher estimates have been reported in this country (Johnson et al, 1986;Watanabe & Milburn, 1988). One little segment of the population, however, did act.…”
Section: Feelingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in the first half of the decade, antinuclear activists constituted a rather small portion of the United States population; a good estimate seems to be 10% (Fuld & Nevin, 1988), although significantly higher estimates have been reported in this country (Johnson et al, 1986;Watanabe & Milburn, 1988). One little segment of the population, however, did act.…”
Section: Feelingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such decreased expectations of survival have constituted one of the biggest changes in beliefs over time (Fiske, 1987). Fearful expectations have been reported elsewhere: 88% of respondents in Finland felt that they would "probably die" (Johnson et al, 1986), 77% in Great Britain (Gallup Poll, 1982, as cited in Tizard, 1985, and 86% in Canada believed that they would not survive a nuclear war (Dyal and Morris, 1987). Fearful expectations have been reported elsewhere: 88% of respondents in Finland felt that they would "probably die" (Johnson et al, 1986), 77% in Great Britain (Gallup Poll, 1982, as cited in Tizard, 1985, and 86% in Canada believed that they would not survive a nuclear war (Dyal and Morris, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This particular town is well-known for its well-informed, well-educated, civic-minded residents. I randomly sampled 496 respondents, and quite a different picture emerged (Johnson, Pulkkinen, Oranen, & Poijula, 1986). Only 30% felt that a nuclear incident was unlikely in the next decade (20% said it was certain, and 50% said it was moderately certain).…”
Section: Ramapo Collegementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study (Johnson, Pulkkinen, Oranen, & Poijula, 1986) found that, "20% of the Americans said a nuclear incident was almost certain…and 50% of Americans felt it was moderately certain…If there was a nuclear war, only…6% of the Americans thought they would survive…78% of the Americans said they would probably die" (p. 157-158). At this point in time, audiences had already seen the damaging effects that nuclear warfare can have.…”
Section: Blurred Lines; Fact or Fiction?mentioning
confidence: 99%