2003
DOI: 10.1080/0885625032000078952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of Greek parents of typically developing kindergarten children towards inclusive education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
1
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
38
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…013. A similar findings were established by Tafa and Manolitsis (2003) where mothers who had maximum education displayed more constructive behaviour to inclusion of learners with SENs than to mothers with a minimum level of education. Nonetheless, Kalyva et al (2007) documented that their level of education does not influence the attitude of parents of learners with SENs.…”
Section: Educational Factorssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…013. A similar findings were established by Tafa and Manolitsis (2003) where mothers who had maximum education displayed more constructive behaviour to inclusion of learners with SENs than to mothers with a minimum level of education. Nonetheless, Kalyva et al (2007) documented that their level of education does not influence the attitude of parents of learners with SENs.…”
Section: Educational Factorssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…the special teacher's) responsibility whether in schools with additional learning support bases (integration units) or without. Interestingly, the recent inclusive developments appear to have been embraced by the general public and the parents of typically developing children in particular (Kalyva et al, in press;Tafa & Manolitsis, 2003).…”
Section: Researching Teachers' Attitudes Towards Inclusion In the Grementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries, this resulted in changing education policies and in making regular education the standard provision for all students, including those with special educational needs. One of the core ideas behind these changes is that both children with and without disabilities experience social benefits in regular schools (Flem and Keller 2000), like acceptance of children with disabilities in society (Tafa and Manolitsis 2003) and friendships (Scheepstra et al 1999). Although more acceptance and friendships for students with disabilities in regular schools are a widely supported aim, implementing inclusion in daily practice is challenging (Ferguson 2008;Vislie 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%