Attitudes of health professionals towards people with substance use disorders in Brazil, controlling for the effects of social desirability

Abstract

Health professionals are in a strategic position to help people with substance use disorders (SUDs) who seek health services for support or treatment. However, it is known that professionals' attitudes towards people who use alcohol and other drugs are marked by stigmatizing attitudes that create barriers to access quality treatment and make it difficult for the user to adhere to it. From this, the present study aimed to investigate the attitudes of 264 health professionals from specialised services and primary health care (PHC) in the Southeast region of Brazil, through Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Providers (OMS-HC), taking into account the hypothesis of contact with the subject as a predictor of more positive attitudes. For this, a Multiple Hierarchical Regression was carried out to ascertain the contribution of the variables used in the explanatory model of attitudes. In addition, the measure of social desirability (SD), assessed by Brazilian Portuguese adaptation of Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, was used as a control variable in the regression model to obtain a more robust and accurate model regarding the presence of biased responses, pervasive in studies on attitudes. In general, our findings showed that contact/familiarity with substance use, either through direct contact with users or through the respondent's own use, predicted more positive attitudes, with specialised service professionals expressing more positive attitudes than those working in PHC. Blaming the user for his/her condition presented itself as a predictor of more negative attitudes.Studies like this are of paramount importance for understanding the relationship established between professionals and service users and, therefore, for tailoring interventions and programs that aim to reduce stigmatizing attitudes and provide better access to health for people with SUDs. The importance of using the SD measure as a control variable in Regression is also emphasised, as an effective way to overcome to a common limitation in studies of attitudes.

Evaluation of nurses’ attitudes and behaviors regarding narcotic drug safety and addiction: a descriptive cross-sectional study

“…It can be said that nurses are less biased toward addicted individuals compared to the general population [ 21 ]. Some research in the literature supports the results of our study by showing that the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward addicted individuals are more positive [ 38 – 40 ]. Broadu and Evans identified factors such as gender, age, education, religious beliefs, and history of addiction treatment as influencing attitudes toward addicted individuals [ 41 ].…”

Evidence of validity of the adapted version of the Attribution Questionnaire for Drug dependence (AQ-D).

“…Initially, the AQ-26B was validated in Portuguese for people with mental disorders (Pereira et al, 2016). Considering the specificities of the stigma related to people who use alcohol and other drugs (Leite Ferreira et al, 2022), it was decided to adapt the original version. Considering that the theoretical matrix (causal attribution theory) of the original scale was maintained (P. Corrigan et al, 2003), the newly adapted version was called the Attribution Questionnaire for Drugs (AQ-D).…”

“…Another important aspect regarding the validation of the AQ-D is that a vignette for cocaine dependence was used. Although studies show that the use of illicit substances has similar stigmas (Leite Ferreira et al, 2022), it is important to consider this aspect when the instrument is used for situations that require greater specificity in terms of analyses for other substances. In addition, validation studies of the AQ-D for other substances are suggested to add further evidence of validity.…”

“…The stigma associated with the consumption of psychoactive substances is usually linked to the belief that people with substance use disorders (SUDs) are dangerous, irresponsible, and victims of their situation (Clark, 2021; Röhm et al, 2022). In health care contexts, this situation leads to a gap between the need to seek help or treatment and obtaining it (Leite Ferreira et al, 2022; Querido et al, 2016; Stangl et al, 2019).…”