2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10164-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of IT teacher candidates towards computer programming and their self-efficacy and opinions regarding to block-based programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there are studies on non-cognitive factors that support the results of this study. It was found that there is a moderate significant relationship between CPA and CPSE (Çoban, Korkmaz, Çakır & Erdoğmuş, 2020); and a moderate significant relationship between CT and CPSE (Durak, Yılmaz, & Yılmaz, 2019) and CPSE predicted CT significantly (Avcu & Ayverdi, 2020). The importance of the data obtained within the scope of this study is that the CPSE and CPA variables, which come to mind as the non-cognitive factor when it comes to CT, are considered together for the middle school students, and this study reveals the order of their importance.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the literature, there are studies on non-cognitive factors that support the results of this study. It was found that there is a moderate significant relationship between CPA and CPSE (Çoban, Korkmaz, Çakır & Erdoğmuş, 2020); and a moderate significant relationship between CT and CPSE (Durak, Yılmaz, & Yılmaz, 2019) and CPSE predicted CT significantly (Avcu & Ayverdi, 2020). The importance of the data obtained within the scope of this study is that the CPSE and CPA variables, which come to mind as the non-cognitive factor when it comes to CT, are considered together for the middle school students, and this study reveals the order of their importance.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Scholars have pointed out that programming beginners have difficulties with learning (Law et al, 2010; Ramalingam & Wiedenbeck, 2004), which may stem from their self-efficacy factor (Çoban et al, 2020; Kong et al, 2018; Tsai, 2019; Yukselturk & Altiok, 2017). Thus, the self-efficacy factor was examined in previous studies on general programming (Kong et al, 2018; Kovari & Katona, 2023) or block-based programming (Belland et al, 2022; Durak, 2018; Ma et al, 2021; Wei et al, 2021; Yukselturk & Altiok, 2017; Çoban et al, 2020). For example, in Durak’s (2018) study, students used Scratch to carry out digital story design activities in programming learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programming learning requires that learners experience the execution of program applications (apps) and increase their confidence in programming learning by completing an actual program (Kong et al, 2018; Wei et al, 2021; Yukselturk & Altiok, 2017). In response to the learning threshold of the traditional textual program, block-based programming instruction has recently emerged as a beginner’s tool for programming learning (Çoban et al, 2020; Weintrop & Wilensky, 2019; Weng et al, 2023; Vasconcelos & Kim, 2022). Using a visual programming language interface reduces the learning barrier of memorizing syntax.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He advocated for the perspective of ‘programming empowerment’ and encouraged children to develop high‐order thinking through programming (Papert, 1980). Afterwards, K‐12 programming education rapidly developed, and various programming platforms were continuously launched, including visual programming (Scratch, Code.org, AppInventor, LightBot, and Blockly) (Çoban et al, 2020), educational robotics (Lego, Arduino, mBot, BeeBot, Botley, and TangibleK robots) (Fessakis & Prantsoudi, 2019), and unplugged (CS unplugged, PAP, Codemonkey, and Kodable) (Aranda et al, 2019; Deng et al, 2020; Resnick & Robinson, 2017; Scherer et al, 2019). Incorporating programming into the K‐12 curriculum has become a global consensus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of research of K‐12 programming education pays more attention to teachers' teaching behaviour (Fessakis & Prantsoudi, 2019; Pérez‐Calderón et al, 2021), but less attention paid to their attitudes. However, compared with the teachers' proficiency in programming knowledge and skills, their previous attitude towards programming and teaching intention may be the key to determine the effect of K‐12 programming education (Çoban et al, 2020). Therefore, measuring K‐12 teachers' attitudes towards programming is a prerequisite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%