2004
DOI: 10.1136/pmj.2003.009571
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of preclinical medical students towards caring for chronically ill and dying patients: does palliative care teaching make a difference?

Abstract: Introduction: Students entering medical school today will encounter an ageing population and a higher incidence of diseases affecting the elderly-for example, chronic respiratory and cardiac disease and malignancy. Purpose: This study was carried out to determine the attitudes of preclinical medical students towards the care of patients for whom a cure is not possible. Methods: All students were invited to complete a 23 item questionnaire prior to initial teaching and again following the second teaching sessio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Following the session, there was an overall significant improvement in knowledge, pain management and attitude scores in all the three groups (Table 2) showing the impact of the session and ability of the students in gaining knowledge about palliative care, which was similar to previous studies. 12,13 The knowledge scoring was based on students' awareness about the term palliative care, approaches and goal of palliative care and also, any need for psychological, emotional, spiritual support along with medical treatment. The pre-session and post-session knowledge scores were analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Following the session, there was an overall significant improvement in knowledge, pain management and attitude scores in all the three groups (Table 2) showing the impact of the session and ability of the students in gaining knowledge about palliative care, which was similar to previous studies. 12,13 The knowledge scoring was based on students' awareness about the term palliative care, approaches and goal of palliative care and also, any need for psychological, emotional, spiritual support along with medical treatment. The pre-session and post-session knowledge scores were analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is emphasis on students gaining clinical exposure during the preclinical years and building on that during subsequent clinical attachments. There were scanty studies, [7][8][9]12,15 undertaken to assess the perception of medical graduates regarding communication, chronic diseases and death in the western world. However, few studies have been conducted in Indian setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aging of society, deaths due to chronic diseases have outnumbered those due to acute diseases. 7,8 Where over 90% of hospital beds are occupied with patients suffering from chronic disease or illness. 8,9 For these patients, the control of symptoms and supportive care or palliative care is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 Another hindrance to EOL curriculum evaluation relates to the quality and standards of measures of attitudinal constructs that are at least as important to delivering quality EOL care as their cognitive and behavioral counterparts, but may present more of a challenge to evaluate effectively. Attitudinal constructs have been assessed in a small number of EOL curriculum evaluation studies, and have focused on perceived value of 24 or comfort with 25 the course, or attitudes towards hospice, 26,27 or the perspective of various stakeholders in the hospital community (e.g., learners, attending physicians, nursing staff) toward the curriculum. 28 These attitudinal constructs have usually been assessed by single questions, which are likely to be less reliable than multi-item scales, or focus group interviews, an approach that can be valuable for hypothesis generation but less so SCHWARTZ ET AL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%