Climate change is one of the greatest challenges for our society to face. To assess the state of Science on climate change, the United Nations Environment Program and the World Meteorological Organization created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988. With 195 member countries, it is also responsible for providing regular scientific reports, future risk estimations, and mitigation options on climate change. Their fifth and last report was published in 2014 (IPCC, 2014) and the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report is expected for 2022. This report shows a wide consensus that the observed increase in global temperature is produced by anthropogenic causes. Because of this fact, very recent social movements, such as the modern "Fridays for Future", have emerged in order to raise awareness and to provide a response to climate change.Several studies have been published relating climate change and society (Yu et al., 2013; Bray and von Storch, 2016). Some of these studies are based on the idea of climatology as a post-normal science (Bray and Storch, 1999). For example, Ratter et al. (2012) concluded that there was a decline in attention of the western society on climate change in that time. They indicated that such decline could be a manifestation of attention cycles and it may reverse in the future. Recently, von Storch et al. (2019) carried out a survey to learn about the opinions of students about climate change, namely, at the Ocean University of China in Qingdao in 2015-2016, and at the Cluster of Excellence Integrated Climate System Analysis and Prediction of the University of Hamburg in 2017. The responses collected from 87 (Qingdao)and 72 (Hamburg) undergraduates and post-graduates allowed von Stroch et al. (2019) to conclude that the differences in the attitudes between both groups about the roles of science, of the state and of the civil society in facing climate change can be explained by cultural differences. Moreover, although in both surveys most of the respondents attributed climate change to anthropogenic effects, the percentage in the case of Hamburg survey (93 %) was greater than in Qingdao survey (70 %).