1982
DOI: 10.1177/1077727x8201100210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes Toward Clothing, Body and Self: A Comparison of Two Groups

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) if two racial groups differed on self‐ esteem, body satisfaction, and clothing variables, and (2) if relationships existed among the variables. Two groups of subjects, 164 White and 68 Black collegiate females, were administered the Rosenberg Self‐Image Questionnaire, the Body Characteristic De scriptive Scale, the Sexually Attractive Clothing Measure, and the Clothing Opinion naire. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and correlations. The two racial gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statements from both the Clothing Benefits Scale developed by Shim and Bickle (1994) and by Ford and Drake (1982) were used. An example of a person-based statement was, 'I buy clothing which emphasizes my gender'.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statements from both the Clothing Benefits Scale developed by Shim and Bickle (1994) and by Ford and Drake (1982) were used. An example of a person-based statement was, 'I buy clothing which emphasizes my gender'.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 See Davis (1985) and Pedersen, Markee, and Salusso (1994) for other articles focusing on bodies by textiles and clothing scholars that were published in psychology journals. this way, the body as a context for clothing became an important area of study in textiles and clothing, including relationships among body satisfaction and other variables such as garment satisfaction, self-esteem, and shopping practices (Feather, Herr, & Ford, 1997;Ford & Drake, 1982;LaBat & DeLong, 1990;Shim, Kotsiopulos, & Knoll, 1991). this way, the body as a context for clothing became an important area of study in textiles and clothing, including relationships among body satisfaction and other variables such as garment satisfaction, self-esteem, and shopping practices (Feather, Herr, & Ford, 1997;Ford & Drake, 1982;LaBat & DeLong, 1990;Shim, Kotsiopulos, & Knoll, 1991).…”
Section: Body Image Linkages To Aesthetics and Social Psychology Of Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars in our field have also laid the foundations to support theoretically the study of affective aspects of bodies from an aesthetics standpoint (DeLong, 1998;Fiore, Kimle, & Moreno, 1996a, 1996bFiore, Moreno, & Kimle, 1996;Kwon & Parham, 1994;, and from a sociocultural perspective (Ford & Drake, 1982;Johnson, 1990;Kaiser, 1997;Shim, Kotsiopulos, & Knoll, 1991). Although these citations by no means include all research related to the study of bodies or body image in our field, they are evidence of the theoretical work from within our field that paves the way for additional study of body image.…”
Section: Positioning Body Image Within Textiles and Clothing Subject mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gayne (1982) found a relationship between Jewish identity and wearing particular styles of religious garb. Differences have been found in the type of contemporary clothing worn by students in Taiwan and the United States on specific occasions (Hao, 1971 (Kelley, Daigle, La Fleur, and Wilson, 1974); Blacks have had higher clothing expenditures than non-Blacks (Dardis, Derrick, and Lehfeld, 1981); and Blacks have used sexually attractive clothing for leisure time, class wear, and casual dates with greater frequency than Whites (Ford & Drake, 1982). Contemporary dress is defined here as any dress worn by individuals in today's society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%