2014
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2013.872399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes toward mixed methods research in psychology: the best of both worlds?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We (the three authors) sorted the 578 words into categories, based on theme of content (cf. thematic analysis; Povee & Roberts, 2015): The themes were continually reworked by us to ensure that each category had sufficient content. We first sorted the words, where those relating to the same specific theme were added together.…”
Section: Free Association On Swedish Citizens Receiving Welfare Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We (the three authors) sorted the 578 words into categories, based on theme of content (cf. thematic analysis; Povee & Roberts, 2015): The themes were continually reworked by us to ensure that each category had sufficient content. We first sorted the words, where those relating to the same specific theme were added together.…”
Section: Free Association On Swedish Citizens Receiving Welfare Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychologists are becoming increasingly more open to the use of these designs; however, misunderstandings about the nature of mixed methods persist (Povee & Roberts, ). Psychologists’ perception that mixed methods is useful is also counterbalanced by some opinions that qualitative phases in these designs are secondary or “tokenized.” This stance may be informed by psychologists generally being less knowledgeable of qualitative designs, inhibiting their skill set in completing mixed methods studies.…”
Section: Understanding Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such orientations may lead psychotherapy researchers to dismiss mixed methods as a futile effort or to conduct the study without the full rigor such a pursuit deserves. This is further complicated by a lack of mixed methods training for some psychologists (Povee & Roberts, ), which can contribute to undervaluing mixed methods (cf. McKim, ).…”
Section: Understanding Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As part of a larger mixed methods project examining attitudes to qualitative and mixed methods research in psychology (see Povee & Roberts, 2014b, for information on the component of the project examining attitudes towards mixed methods research), we interviewed 21 Australian psychology students and academics about their attitudes towards qualitative research (Povee & Roberts, 2014a). Using the multicomponent model of attitudes by Chaiken (1993, 2007) as a framework, interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis to reveal the associated affective, behavioural, and cognitive themes underlying attitudes towards qualitative research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%