The public provision of welfare for the elderly often reflects a generational contract that defines the distribution of benefits and duties across generations, which has been institutionalized in the modern welfare state to meet the requirements of those in need, in accordance with the values of collectivism, altruism, fairness, and justice. In the case of pensions, the working population is expected to support the older generations through a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) arrangement (Prinzen, 2014; Rantanen, McLaughlin, & Toikko, 2015). As the elderly are generally less productive and have diminished physical capacity, they are accepted as dependents, in need of support from family and society. Historically, those who contribute to the support of the elderly are assured that they, in turn, will be supported by future generations. Generational solidarity has been commended for promoting cohesiveness through shared obligations and reciprocity (Bengtson & Oyama, 2010). Recently, there has been growing concern about the distribution of welfare resources across generations: A principle of "generational equity" has called into question the appropriation of resources in favor of the older generation. Younger generations, in particular, are disadvantaged because they contribute more during their productive years while the certainty of enjoying the benefits in their old age no longer exists: current systems are at risk, given the prospect of a "super-aged" society. The interests of different generations are presented as a zero-sum calculation in which a more self-centered approach could become popular (Higgs & Gilleard, 2010). Traditionally, Chinese society has been guided by the moral imperative of respect for the elderly and belief in communal values. Supporting public provisions for seniors is also motivated by a sense of compassion (Earley & Gibson, 1998). However, these values have been challenged as Chinese societies have modernized at a time their populations have increasingly aged. However, at the same time, social citizenship has been increasingly popular and supporting claims for public resources legitimately. While elderly provisions could be supported either by the