Attitudes toward Rehabilitation and Punishment Orientations among Juvenile Detention and Probation Officers

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to explore the individual factors, job perceptions, and organizational characteristics that predict rehabilitation and punishment orientations among juvenile detention and probation staff members. Our results indicated juvenile officers who reported more education, less job ambiguity, and more adequate safety training were more likely to indicate preference for a rehabilitation orientation. However, those who reported less education, worked in detention rather than probation, and had higher job ambiguity were more likely to hold a punishment orientation. Finally, individual characteristics had a greater impact on both rehabilitation and punishment than either job perceptions or organizational factors. These results provide useful information for agencies about staff perceptions, which may in turn impact their interactions with and decision-making related to juvenile offenders under their supervision. Keywords: juvenile detention officers, juvenile probation officers, community corrections, punishment orientation, rehabilitation orientation, professional orientation.

Exploring the Impact of Rehabilitation and Custody Orientations on Workplace Experiences of Juvenile Probation and Detention Officers

“…A number of control variables were also included in the analysis. They were drawn from the most recent study on predictors of rehabilitation and punishment orientation among juvenile justice staff (Mack & Rhineberger-Dunn, 2021). The controlas included gender, degree, job position, tenure, contact hours, as well as perceptions of educational and safety training, supervisor and coworker support, job dangerousness, fear of harm, and finally views on both role-related issues (i.e., conflict, ambiguity, and overload) and input into decision-making.…”