Attitudes toward science: A quantitative synthesis

Abstract

Meta-AnalysisThe term "meta-analysis" refers to the quantitative synthesis of research findings. Glass (1976) describes it thus:Meta-analysis refers to the analysis of a large collection of analysis results from individual studies for the purpose of integrating the findings. (p. 3).The primary objective of any meta-analysis is to determine an overall effect size as a summary of related research. A secondary objective is to determine which factors contribute most to this effect size.While meta-analysis has a great many benefits to researchers and practitioners alike, there are some limitations as well. First, research findings, as typically reported, vary greatly. Measures of attitudes and other variables may be vaguely defined or unreliably measured. Such a state of affairs seriously distorts the results of any meta-analysis. Unreliable data are known to attenuate correlations, and relationships are consequently underestimated.Second, any search for research on a topic will lead to the immediately identifiable, published studies, while conference reports, dissertations, and other unpublished papers are more difficult to identify and obtain. When, for practical reasons, a research synthesis only includes published or oft-cited studies, a bias may be introduced.Third, some research reports are clearly not synthesizable. That is, the report fails to provide the basic, elemental descriptive statistics that allow the reader to assess effect sizes.These problems should not belie the effectiveness of meta-analysis but merely point out some limitations. Despite these difficulties, the results of meta-analysis can provide insights into the study of determinants of attitudes toward science, but like any single research study, should be interpreted with some caution. Defining Attitudes toward ScienceA cursory review of the topic "attitudes toward science" will reveal that many persons define attitudes in a variety of ways. Peterson and Carlson (1979) report in their review that there are over 30 studies a year on attitudes toward science; however, a closer look reveals much diversity in definition. The problem of measuring attitudes, alluded to by Pearl (1 973), begins to be solved by adequate definition. Fortunately, there has been extensive work on defining many aspects of science attitudes. These definitions are briefly presented as a background for the present review, which focuses on the attitudes of students toward the subject matter of science.

Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece

“…Another finding from the previous research is the low up to moderate correlation between attitude and achievement (Freedman, 1997;Germann, 1988;Haladyna & Shauhnessy, 1982;Wilson, 1983). From a meta-analysis covering literature from 1970 to 1991, evidence was found that high-performing girls, "doing well" or "achieving" in science was closely linked with "liking" science (Weinburgh, 1995).…”

Attitudes and Interests Towards Biotechnology: the Mismatch Between Students and Teachers

“…Haladyna and Shaughnessy (1982) posited students' attitudes are determined by the teacher, the student and the learning environment. Simpson and Oliver (1990) later found the preparation of the teacher, the nature of the hands-on activities, and the student involvement in the learning are important variables in student attitude.…”

Lessons Learned From the Implementation and Assessment of Student-Centered Methodologies

“…No one will contest the fact that instructors are an important source of variation and can dramatically influence student performance and attitudes in the classroom [30][31] so the first step was to make sure that each audience did not perceive the instructor differently. Departmental evaluations were used toward this purpose and analysis of these student evaluations showed there was no significantly different perception of the instructor in the two classes.…”