Attitudes towards genomic. Research in four Latin American countries

Abstract

The present reflection refers to data obtained about the social representations of genomic research and its applications through interviews with legislators and lawyers, biomedical researchers and civilians and the review of scientific and legal literature in four Latin American countries: Argentine, Chile, Mexico and Peru. Several issues are addressed: little access to prevention and therapeutic methods, lack of equity in health benefits, commercialization of gene sequences through patents which leads to commercial exploitation of underdeveloped countries, the possibility of physical or psychological damage or genetic discrimination, the possibility of genetic modifications or abortion for eugenic reasons, the necessity of safeguarding confidentiality, risks and benefits of the use of transgenics and cloning, the necessity of legal regulation to prevent the pathway towards genetic enhancement or reproductive human cloning and of regulating access to genetic information. Using the method of content analysis of verbal behaviour to evaluate the degree of anxiety and hostility of subjects in relation to the Human Genome Project (HGP) developed by Gottschalk and Gleser, an inverse relation between levels of anxiety and level of knowledge was observed which highlights the importance of educating the population. Differences in the level of hostility towards the HGP were also found among the groups.Research funded by grants from U.S. Department of Energy award DE-FG02-02R 63435 and also through fellowships to students of the International Program of Ethics of Biomedical and Psychosocial Research, supported by Fogarty NIH Research Grant #D43 TW 06056

Corporate social responsibility and biotechnological foods: an experimental study on consumer’s behaviour

“…In fact, several studies document a robust link between GFs and fear (Jagadeesan and Salem, 2015; Ronteltap et al , 2007; Lusk et al , 2006). For instance, some authors found that people’s general neophobia was correlated with their concerns and negativity regarding novel food technologies (Defez, 2016; Wunderlich and Gatto, 2015; Šorgo and Ambrožič-Dolinšek, 2010; Yunta et al , 2005; Pardo et al , 2002). Opposition to other forms of new technology has its roots in fear and, accordingly, fear and general distress are highly inter-correlated (Valente and Chaves, 2018; Boccia, 2015; Sadler and Zeidler, 2005; Scholderer and Frewer, 2003).…”

The influence of intelligence and emotions on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms

“…Emotions are often hidden in related concepts, such as concern (James, 2004), moral acceptability (Črne-Hladnik et al 2009), personal or general risk and uncertainty (Finucane, 2002;Ronteltap et al 2007;Christoph et al 2008). The most frequently reported emotions concerning GMOs are negative ones such as worry (anxiety) (Yunta et al 2005), anger (Stewart and McLean, 2005) and fear (Laros and Steenkamp, 2004). Reports of fear concerning genetically modified food (GMF) frequently appear in the mass media (Laros and Steenkamp, 2004), and the term "Frankenfoods" reflects opinions shared by many (Flores and Tobin, 2002).…”

Knowlege of, attitudes toward, and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among prospective teachers of biology, home economics, and grade school in Slovenia

“…Nowadays we are witnesses that the transfer of biotechnology discoveries to crop production, industry, or medicine is not only restricted by the limiting factors of technology, underdeveloped scientific methods, or modes of scientific reasoning but also by ethics, morals, faith, the economy, environmental responsibility, risks, politics, education, etc. [1–8].…”