1995
DOI: 10.1080/00140139508925125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes towards unions as predictors of actual strike behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The attitudes towards unions are seen as important determinants of industrial relations outcomes (Jarley & Kuruvilla, 1994). Furthermore, union attitudes have been found to be predictors for support of strike actions (Kelloway et al, 2008) as well as predictors for actual strike behavior (Tivendell & Watson, 1995). Thus, we hypothesize: Attitudes towards unions are negatively correlated with negative reactions towards strikes (H3a) and positively correlated with legitimacy of strikes (H3b), informing oneself about strikes (H3c), strike-related social network behavior (H3d), and support of strikers (H3e).…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attitudes towards unions are seen as important determinants of industrial relations outcomes (Jarley & Kuruvilla, 1994). Furthermore, union attitudes have been found to be predictors for support of strike actions (Kelloway et al, 2008) as well as predictors for actual strike behavior (Tivendell & Watson, 1995). Thus, we hypothesize: Attitudes towards unions are negatively correlated with negative reactions towards strikes (H3a) and positively correlated with legitimacy of strikes (H3b), informing oneself about strikes (H3c), strike-related social network behavior (H3d), and support of strikers (H3e).…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%