2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.14358
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attractor invariants, brane tilings and crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above compatibility means that it is enough to know stability data A Q,W Z for some Z in order to determine stability data A σ for all special geometric stability conditions σ. A complete (conjectural) description of stability data A Q,W Z exists for P 2 and other surfaces [8,55]. It is fully verified for small dimension vectors.…”
Section: Scattering Diagrammentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above compatibility means that it is enough to know stability data A Q,W Z for some Z in order to determine stability data A σ for all special geometric stability conditions σ. A complete (conjectural) description of stability data A Q,W Z exists for P 2 and other surfaces [8,55]. It is fully verified for small dimension vectors.…”
Section: Scattering Diagrammentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This implies that knowing stability data on D b (mod J W ), we can reconstruct stability data on D b (Coh X). A complete (but still conjectural except for low dimension vectors) description of stability data on D b (mod J W ) was given in [8,55]. A partial description of stability data on D b (Coh X) was given in [12] (the scattering diagram used there captures a significant, but incomplete information about the stability data).…”
Section: Stability Conditions On Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly our partition function agrees with a theorem of [23] according to which the MacMahon factor in front is not a square of the same refinement; and also agrees with the result physical expectation that such partition functions should have coefficients which are linear combinations of SU (N ) characters. Note however that the differences between the partition functions can all be traced to the ambiguity of defining the MacMahon, arising from the non-compactness of the moduli space, see [25] for a recent discussion. Furthermore our result depends explicitly on the torus chosen to take the refined limit.…”
Section: Refined and Unrefined Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this note we study K-theoretic Donaldson-Thomas theory defined on noncommutative crepant resolutions of Calabi-Yau singularities as a model for the M2-brane index in M-theory. Recent progress in K-theoretic countings of BPS states have been made in the contest of smooth geometries and fourfolds [2,3,12,13,16,19,25,29,31,34] as well as defects in quantum field theory [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%