2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03352-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attractor Properties for Irreversible and Reversible Interacting Particle Systems

Abstract: We consider translation-invariant interacting particle systems on the lattice with finite local state space admitting at least one Gibbs measure as a timestationary measure. The dynamics can be irreversible but should satisfy some mild non-degeneracy conditions. We prove that weak limit points of any trajectory of translation-invariant measures, satisfying a non-nullness condition, are Gibbs states for the same specification as the time-stationary measure. This is done under the additional assumption that zero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Jahnel and Külske [JK19] have extended the free energy density approach to non-reversible dynamics on integer-lattice systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Jahnel and Külske [JK19] have extended the free energy density approach to non-reversible dynamics on integer-lattice systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention here time-evolved discrete lattice spins [19,30], continuous lattice spins [24,34], time-evolved models of point particles in Euclidean space [17], and models on trees [32]. For a discussion of non-Gibbsian behavior of timeevolved lattice measures in regard to the approach to a (possibly non-unique) invariant state under dynamics, see [16], for relevance of non-Gibbsianness to the infinite-volume Gibbs variational principle (and its possible failure) see [22,25]. For recent developments for one-dimensional long-range systems, and the relation between continuity of one-sided (vs. two-sided) conditional probabilities see [2][3][4]31].…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our example above P t is the symmetric independent spin-flip dynamics, and does not involve a randomization of the spatial degrees of freedom. However it is clear that one would like to study more generally also dependent dynamics, and also possibly irreversible dynamics, compare [31,19]. Such studies have been performed at first for the Ising model on the lattice, for work on this and related work see [8,30,28,11,12,9,13,26].…”
Section: Dynamical Gibbs-non Gibbs Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%