2015
DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attribute‐Level and Pattern‐Level Classification Consistency and Accuracy Indices for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment

Abstract: Classification consistency and accuracy are viewed as important indicators for evaluating the reliability and validity of classification results in cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to absolute fit statistics, there is not a definite criterion for Pɑ and Pc values. In the light of the results obtained by Cui, Gierl, and Chang (2012), Wang, Song, Chen, Meng, and Ding (2015), and Johnson and Sinharay (2018), the values of accuracy and consistency are fairly high and acceptable in the current study. These moderate values of Pɑ and Pc at the wholepattern can be due to the presence of moderate correlations among the attributes (Cui et al, 2012).…”
Section: Model Fitsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Similar to absolute fit statistics, there is not a definite criterion for Pɑ and Pc values. In the light of the results obtained by Cui, Gierl, and Chang (2012), Wang, Song, Chen, Meng, and Ding (2015), and Johnson and Sinharay (2018), the values of accuracy and consistency are fairly high and acceptable in the current study. These moderate values of Pɑ and Pc at the wholepattern can be due to the presence of moderate correlations among the attributes (Cui et al, 2012).…”
Section: Model Fitsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the model-based DIF checking, the Wald test ( Hou et al, 2014 ) was used. In the testing of reliability and validity, the classification accuracy ( P a ) and consistency ( P c ) indices ( Wang et al, 2015 ) were computed.…”
Section: Development Of the Instrument For Longitudinal Learning Diagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional reliability and validity concepts introduced in classical test theory and item response theory have not yet been fully applied to cognitive diagnostic assessment, which mainly focuses on making classification decisions about discrete latent attributes (Henson & Douglas, ; Henson, Roussos, Douglas, & He, ). Therefore, research on reliability and validity in the context of cognitive diagnostic assessment is a relatively new topic, which has drawn increasing attention in the field of educational measurement recently (Cui, Gierl, & Chang, ; Ding, Mao, Wang, Luo, & Cui, ; Gierl, Cui, & Zhou, ; Leighton & Gierl, ; Rupp, Templin, & Henson, ; Tatsuoka, ; Templin & Bradshaw, ; Wang, Song, Chen, Meng, & Ding, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature on this topic, including books and articles, has established several indices for evaluating the reliability and validity in cognitive diagnostic assessment (e.g., Cui et al., ; Ding et al., ; Gierl et al., ; Rupp et al., ; Tatsuoka, ; Templin & Bradshaw, ; Wang et al., ). Most of them are post hoc indices, because they can only be calculated at the end of the tests when all test‐takers’ response data are collected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation