Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132847.3132919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attributed Network Embedding for Learning in a Dynamic Environment

Abstract: Network embedding leverages the node proximity manifested to learn a low-dimensional node vector representation. e learned embeddings could advance various learning tasks such as node classi cation, network clustering, and link prediction. Most, if not all, of the existing work, is overwhelmingly performed in the context of plain and static networks. Nonetheless, in reality, network structure o en evolves over time with addition/deletion of links and nodes. Also, a vast majority of real-world networks are asso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
191
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we do not plot the performance of NMF as its F1 scores are much lower than other models. Some work includes node attributes as additional information source when using NMF related models for node classification [11,17], but this is beyond our experiment setting. From the figures, some observations are summarized as below:…”
Section: Node Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we do not plot the performance of NMF as its F1 scores are much lower than other models. Some work includes node attributes as additional information source when using NMF related models for node classification [11,17], but this is beyond our experiment setting. From the figures, some observations are summarized as below:…”
Section: Node Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], the authors evaluated the effectiveness of embedding representations of DeepWalk and LINE on network clustering. Both approaches showed nearly the same performance.…”
Section: Techniques For Inspecting Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all the aforementioned methods only focus on static network embedding. There are some attempts in temporal network embedding, which can be broadly classified into two categories: embedding snapshot networks [6,8,14,34,35] and modeling temporal evolution [19,26,37]. The basic idea of the former is to learn node embedding for each network snapshot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea of the former is to learn node embedding for each network snapshot. Specifically, DANE [14] and DHPE [35] present efficient algorithms based on perturbation theory. Song et al extend skip-gram based models and propose a dynamic network embedding framework [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%