2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attribution of vision and knowledge in ‘spontaneous perspective taking’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst studies have suggested that mental state attributions do not always directly guide gaze cueing (Gobel et al, 2018;Kingstone et al, 2019). Nevertheless, the findings of this study contrast with recent research, which argues that the processes underlying reflexive gaze following are isolated from the influence of theory of mind or perspective taking processes (Millett et al, 2019;. These studies draw their conclusions from experiments demonstrating that participants can show perspective taking effects even in the absence of a social partner (Wilson et al, 2017), or fail to take into account an obstacle blocking a partner's view and respond as if the partner is able to 'see' through the barrier (as in line-of-sight barrier tasks; Cole et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst studies have suggested that mental state attributions do not always directly guide gaze cueing (Gobel et al, 2018;Kingstone et al, 2019). Nevertheless, the findings of this study contrast with recent research, which argues that the processes underlying reflexive gaze following are isolated from the influence of theory of mind or perspective taking processes (Millett et al, 2019;. These studies draw their conclusions from experiments demonstrating that participants can show perspective taking effects even in the absence of a social partner (Wilson et al, 2017), or fail to take into account an obstacle blocking a partner's view and respond as if the partner is able to 'see' through the barrier (as in line-of-sight barrier tasks; Cole et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This necessarily means that if, for example, a ‘perspective-taking’ effect is not abolished when the agent’s view of the critical stimuli is blocked, then that paradigm is not concerned with visual perspective-taking (see [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]; note, as these references attest, the attempt to abolish a “perspective-taking” effect by blocking the line-of-sight has produced mixed/conflicting results). The same is true if an effect is not abolished when an agent is replaced by a non-agent, such as a chair (e.g., [ 34 , 35 ]). Such paradigms will therefore be of limited value in helping to inform or develop a theory of visual perspective-taking.…”
Section: Representation Rather Than Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whilst it is tempting to say their “viewpoint”, or what they can see (i.e., their “perspective”) has been taken, we now know that inanimate objects without a perspective can create the same ambiguous number effect as a human agent does. For example, if the agent is replaced by a chair, the number “68” is as ambiguous as when the agent is there [ 35 ]. The chair effectively informs the observer that the number can also be “89”.…”
Section: Representation Rather Than Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while some studies have found no effect of the agent's capacity to see (e.g. [128,129], others found that factors that should impede vision influence (like goggles [130,131], blindfolds [64] or barriers [76,132] modulate altercentric interference.…”
Section: Box 2 Are 'Altercentric' Effects Strictly Social?mentioning
confidence: 99%