2007
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypia in Random Periareolar Fine-Needle Aspiration Affects the Decision of Women at High Risk to Take Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention

Abstract: Random periareolar fine-needle aspiration (RPFNA) is a research procedure designed to (a) evaluate short-term breast cancer risk in women at high risk for developing breast cancer, and (b) track response to chemoprevention. Of import, cellular atypia in breast RPFNA is prospectively associated with a 5.6-fold increase in breast cancer risk in women at high risk. Among 99 women attending a clinic for high-risk breast cancer, we explored the effects of RPFNA cytology results on decision making pertaining to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, that is not to say that opinions remain static. In the study of Goldenberg et al (2007), 99 women at high risk who had already declined to take tamoxifen underwent random peri-areolar fine needle aspiration. After the result, 51 out of 99 (51.5%) had a normal cells detected and none of these wished to take tamoxifen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, that is not to say that opinions remain static. In the study of Goldenberg et al (2007), 99 women at high risk who had already declined to take tamoxifen underwent random peri-areolar fine needle aspiration. After the result, 51 out of 99 (51.5%) had a normal cells detected and none of these wished to take tamoxifen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Other studies conducted in similar settings reported that about 50% of women accept an offer to begin tamoxifen. 21, 22 Uptake of tamoxifen in the setting of clinical trials, however, has been lower, ranging from 5–14%. 23, 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies that involved consultation at a specialized breast center reported SERM use ranging from 11% to 58% [36, 40, 41, 50, 61, 62]. Variation in SERM uptake may have been due to the strength of the physician’s recommendation [63].…”
Section: Interventions To Increase Uptake Of Breast Cancer Chemoprevementioning
confidence: 99%