2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical Amygdala Response to Fear Conditioning in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea was also suggested by the first ever fMRI study of fear conditioning in autism (43), where we found much stronger amygdala activation to threat vs. safe cues in a neurotypical adult sample, but significantly reduced differentiation between threat and safe in the autistic sample. We wondered whether elevated baseline arousal—either in everyday life and/or as a function of the intense sensory environment of the MRI setting—provided a sort of ceiling effect for amygdala activation so that additional, task-based activation was less likely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This idea was also suggested by the first ever fMRI study of fear conditioning in autism (43), where we found much stronger amygdala activation to threat vs. safe cues in a neurotypical adult sample, but significantly reduced differentiation between threat and safe in the autistic sample. We wondered whether elevated baseline arousal—either in everyday life and/or as a function of the intense sensory environment of the MRI setting—provided a sort of ceiling effect for amygdala activation so that additional, task-based activation was less likely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It may be that increased task demands could over-tax sensory integration systems, as suggested by fMRI studies from Green et al (52, 53) who sowed atypical sensory response only for simultaneous stimulation of multiple sensory systems, and not for single sensory modalities presented separately. Possible questions for future research include: Could it be that chronically elevated physiological arousal, and/or an elevated response to lab-based stressors, could modulate findings in habituation studies (43)? Is habituation decreased for unimodal sensory stimulation (i.e., only auditory or only tactile) or do difficulties appear only in the integration of multiple stimuli at once (as is common in real life) (52)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This same reasoning applies just as well to explanations for anxiety: reduced modulation of limbic activity via higher cortical systems may result in chronic, unchecked perception of threat and subsequent anxiety (Amaral et al, 2003). Top et al (2016) conducted an fMRI study of fear conditioning and extinction in adults with ASD, concluding that the ASD group failed to recognize safety cues, and thus were delayed in responding to changes between threat to safety contexts.…”
Section: Autism Anxiety and Integration Of Mpfcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no previous studies have examined SFL in individuals with ASD, a small number of studies suggest that autonomic indices of direct fear learning through Pavlovian conditioning are largely intact in this population [ 32 34 ], but reduced differentiation between threat and safety cues in amygdala activity has also been reported [ 35 ]. One study reported stronger SFL in neurotypical individuals with high levels of autistic traits [ 36 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%