2017
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical aspirates of the breast: a dilemma in current cytology practice

Abstract: C3 aspirates were associated with a significant probability of histological malignancy. Certain quantitative, cytomorphological and background features were potentially helpful in predicting the risk of a malignant outcome. The prediction could be clinically useful in the management of C3 cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ROM of an atypical diagnosis varies in the literature from 22 to 39% [10, 14, 52-57], reflecting the variability of the definition and usage of the term “atypical” in the literature. Two more recent studies that looked at applying the IAC Yokohama System had ROM of 13 and 15.7% [16, 17].…”
Section: Category: Atypicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROM of an atypical diagnosis varies in the literature from 22 to 39% [10, 14, 52-57], reflecting the variability of the definition and usage of the term “atypical” in the literature. Two more recent studies that looked at applying the IAC Yokohama System had ROM of 13 and 15.7% [16, 17].…”
Section: Category: Atypicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid on‐site evaluation of cytology specimen adequacy by a pathologist at the time of acquisition has been shown to improve FNAC diagnostic yield, resulting in performances comparable to CNB . Benefits of FNAC over CNB include low procedural cost, quick turn‐around time, minimal complications, essentially no contraindications and reduced patient anxiety with near‐immediate patient follow‐up . Of additional importance are advancements in molecular and prognostic marker testing that allow necessary hormone receptor (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, high specificity and low sensitivity data is echoed across individual studies and also in those presenting with symptomatic nipple discharge, 60,61 with a diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of only 31%. 60 The reason for such low sensitivity of nipple aspirate fluid is that discharge is often ''physiological'' in nature, has a generally high acellular or paucicellular composition, 58,62,63 and therefore is thought to consist almost exclusively of background debris and/or proteinaceous material. 58,64 Methods for NAF evaluation, whether they be cytological assessment or otherwise, suffer as a result of the relatively high proportion of ''non-yielders'': women in whom techniques to obtain NAF fail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%