2022
DOI: 10.1016/bs.apha.2022.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical kinetics of cytochrome P450 enzymes in pharmacology and toxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy falls on the premise of the well-established impact of substrate-dependency in affecting MBI potencies which could range widely even from the presence to absence of MBI with different probe substrates utilized in vitro for the same inactivator. 65 However, definitive guidance surrounding the choice of suitable representative probe substrates for the accurate characterization of auto-inactivation processes remains unavailable. MBI parameters of dronedarone and NDBD against CYP3A4 using rivaroxaban as a probe substrate were minimally adjusted to reduce inactivation potencies compared with the significant optimization to increase MBI potency of NDBD against MAO-A using kynuramine as a probe substrate as experimentally derived K I of 186 μM was clearly nonphysiological.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This strategy falls on the premise of the well-established impact of substrate-dependency in affecting MBI potencies which could range widely even from the presence to absence of MBI with different probe substrates utilized in vitro for the same inactivator. 65 However, definitive guidance surrounding the choice of suitable representative probe substrates for the accurate characterization of auto-inactivation processes remains unavailable. MBI parameters of dronedarone and NDBD against CYP3A4 using rivaroxaban as a probe substrate were minimally adjusted to reduce inactivation potencies compared with the significant optimization to increase MBI potency of NDBD against MAO-A using kynuramine as a probe substrate as experimentally derived K I of 186 μM was clearly nonphysiological.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasonable recapitulation of both dronedarone and NDBD PK upon chronic oral administration of dronedarone was achieved following the iterative adjustments of autoinactivation parameters of NDBD against MAO‐A and both dronedarone and NDBD against CYP3A4. This strategy falls on the premise of the well‐established impact of substrate‐dependency in affecting MBI potencies which could range widely even from the presence to absence of MBI with different probe substrates utilized in vitro for the same inactivator 65 . However, definitive guidance surrounding the choice of suitable representative probe substrates for the accurate characterization of auto‐inactivation processes remains unavailable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While kinetic constants such as K i were classically regarded as intrinsic features of the inhibitor and were thought to be independent of the surrogate probe substrate utilized, there is now a growing consensus in the field that such reductionistic assumptions are only valid when both the probe substrate and inhibitor are competing for access to the same binding site on the P450 enzyme . It has been consistently demonstrated that K i values can vary drastically depending on the choice of probe substrate that is employed in the assay. ,− This invariably leads to a quandary because the K i values of a particular perpetrator drug obtained using the FDA-recommended probes may not be representative of another victim drug, therefore casting doubt on the reliability of DDI predictions gleaned from conventional experimental approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the CYP kinetic profiles are rather complicated, depending on the CYP isoforms, catalyzed substrates, and additives such as the effectors. They can be divided into four categories according to the graphical representations: biphasic kinetics, sigmoidal kinetics, partial inhibition, and complete inhibition . While there is no consensus on the underlying cause of the phenomenon, multiple hypotheses have been proposed to provide explanations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%