2012
DOI: 10.4103/1117-6806.95466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical localizations of hydatid disease: Experience from a single institute

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering only the eligible studies from clinical centres reporting any cases of CE in any anatomical localization and where it was possible to separate liver, lung, from all other localizations (N = 7), liver represented 69.99% (1,441/2,059) of single organ localizations and 71.59% (1562/2,182) when considering multiple localizations [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the same case series, lungs represented 19.18% (395/2,059) of single organ localizations and 20.16% (440/2,182) when considering multiple localizations.…”
Section: Results From Case-reports and Case-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering only the eligible studies from clinical centres reporting any cases of CE in any anatomical localization and where it was possible to separate liver, lung, from all other localizations (N = 7), liver represented 69.99% (1,441/2,059) of single organ localizations and 71.59% (1562/2,182) when considering multiple localizations [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the same case series, lungs represented 19.18% (395/2,059) of single organ localizations and 20.16% (440/2,182) when considering multiple localizations.…”
Section: Results From Case-reports and Case-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%