2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35215-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical postural control can be detected via computer vision analysis in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Evidence suggests that differences in motor function are an early feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One aspect of motor ability that develops during childhood is postural control, reflected in the ability to maintain a steady head and body position without excessive sway. Observational studies have documented differences in postural control in older children with ASD. The present study used computer vision analysis to assess midline head postural control, as reflected in the rate of spontaneous head m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relying on direct observation rather than parent report, the app uses computer vision to assess social attention, affect, social referencing, and motor behaviors. To date, this approach has been shown to reliably distinguish between toddlers at high risk for ASD from toddlers with TD based on patterns of attention, facial expression, motor behavior, and response to name [Campbell et al, 2019;Dawson et al, 2018;Egger et al, 2018]. While this approach does not replace the need for formal evaluation, it does allow for the potential of unbiased identification of children at elevated risk for ASD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on direct observation rather than parent report, the app uses computer vision to assess social attention, affect, social referencing, and motor behaviors. To date, this approach has been shown to reliably distinguish between toddlers at high risk for ASD from toddlers with TD based on patterns of attention, facial expression, motor behavior, and response to name [Campbell et al, 2019;Dawson et al, 2018;Egger et al, 2018]. While this approach does not replace the need for formal evaluation, it does allow for the potential of unbiased identification of children at elevated risk for ASD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings may also open new paths to understanding the close links between cognitive and motor development (Diamond, ; Mittal, Neumann, Saczawa, & Walker, ) and autism (Dawson et al, ; Diamond, ; Esposito & Paşca, ; Green et al, ; Jansiewicz et al, ; Mittal & Walker, ; Nebel et al, ; Whyatt & Craig, ). Indeed, movements produced spontaneously by awake infants can provide a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the infant nervous system (Einspieler & Prechtl, ; Ferrari et al, ; Hadders‐Algra, ; Teitelbaum, Teitelbaum, Nye, Fryman, & Maurer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Concerning the assessment of ASD behavioral cues, computer vision and machine learning techniques have been effectively exploited in the last years to highlight signs that are considered early features of ASD [12]. Computer vision analysis measured participants' attention and orienting in response to name calls in [13] whereas in [14] the head postural stability was evaluated while the children watched a series of dynamic movies involving different types of stimuli. Both works made use of an algorithm that detects and tracks 49 facial landmarks on the child's face and estimates head pose angles relative to the camera by computing the optimal rotation parameters between the detected landmarks and a 3D canonical face model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, from the last column, it is possible to derive that works in [19][20][21][22] did not consider any quantitative evaluation but just a qualitative analysis of the outcomes to highlight the differences in affective abilities of ASD vs. TD groups. [16] x x x expert clinician [15] x manual annotation [13] x x human rater [14] x ASD vs. TD [19] x ASD vs. TD [20] x ASD vs. TD [21] x ASD vs. TD [22] x ASD vs. TD [24] x diagnostic labels (ASD/non-ASD) [23] x x expert human raters (smiling/not smiling)) [8] x expert psychologists (only on ASD Group)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%