2002
DOI: 10.1002/dc.10054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical squamous metaplasia of seromas in breast needle aspirates from irradiated lumpectomy sites: A potential pitfall for false‐positive diagnoses of carcinoma

Abstract: The presence of squamous metaplasic cells is an uncommon finding in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of the breast. We report that FNA smears containing atypical squamous metaplastic cells derived from the lining of seroma-type cavities following lumpectomy and irradiation in patients with breast cancer can be a potential pitfall for a false-positive diagnosis of recurrent malignancy. Four fine-needle breast aspirates from two adult patients with previous histories of invasive breast carcinoma were retrie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 31 Atypical squamous cells can be noted in the smears of seroma A B with post-irradiation atypia, 32 PT with intracanalicular metaplastic epithelial lining cells 33 34 and squamous cell carcinoma (metaplastic carcinoma). Therefore, the presence of atypical squamous cells in the aspirate may not necessarily indicate an underlying malignant lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 31 Atypical squamous cells can be noted in the smears of seroma A B with post-irradiation atypia, 32 PT with intracanalicular metaplastic epithelial lining cells 33 34 and squamous cell carcinoma (metaplastic carcinoma). Therefore, the presence of atypical squamous cells in the aspirate may not necessarily indicate an underlying malignant lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] In none of our cases did we find any atypical squamous metaplastic cells as a potential diagnostic pitfall, as described recently. 4 Also, while the findings of epithelial atypia with a high nuclear/ cytoplasmic ratio 4 may be regarded as a potential diagnostic pitfall for a false positive diagnosis, based on our study we do not consider them of serious consequence since in our cases we used cell blocks to yield reasonable histologic information to minimize the chance of such an error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In these circumstances, FNAC as a first-line, noninvasive investigation may play an important role in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and differentiation from benign changes, including atypia due to radiation, which is known to be a potential diagnostic pitfall for a false positive diagnosis of carcinoma. [1][2][3][4] In the cases in this study we had no difficulty diagnosing the 2 cases of recurrent carcinoma in cytologic preparations, and the cell blocks were of additional help in highlighting the histologic features of the malignant cells that were similar to those of the primary tumor. In 21 cases the cytologic preparations, along with the cell blocks, gave convincing information on the benign nature of the lesion, and in all these cases similar findings were noted on a follow-up aspiration, thus avoiding surgical biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations