“…Today, nonenzymatic glucose sensors are increasingly sought after, even within commercial analytical instruments, 6−8 providing acceptable sensitivity, rapid response times, and lower costs. 9,10 For decades, the fabrication of enzyme-free sensors has largely relied on a variety of electrocatalytic materials, including transition metals (e.g., Ni, 11 Co, 12 Ru, 13 Au, 14−16 metal oxides (e.g., TiO 2 , 17 Co 3 O 4 , 18 NiO, 19 CuO, 20 MoO 4 , 21 RuO 2 , 22 Cu(OH) 2 , 23 IrO 2 , 24 CeO 2 25 ) nanostructures, and organic complexes (e.g., cobalt phthalocyanine tetrasulfo-nate, 26,27 and nickel and cobalt hexacyanoferrate. 28,29 While these materials have led to advancements in sensor technology, their performance can be limited by factors such as insufficient surface area, lower catalytic efficiency, and lack of structural versatility, which are crucial for achieving high sensitivity and selectivity in glucose detection.…”