2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auction prices, market share, and a common agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the bids actually submitted in the Buenos Aires auction, the definitive solution awarded all of the schools to the same bidder (Firm A) at a unit price of U$S 234.84 per month. This is consistent with previous literature that predicts the strongest bidder is always the winner (Maskin and Riley 2000;Coatney et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the bids actually submitted in the Buenos Aires auction, the definitive solution awarded all of the schools to the same bidder (Firm A) at a unit price of U$S 234.84 per month. This is consistent with previous literature that predicts the strongest bidder is always the winner (Maskin and Riley 2000;Coatney et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, if historical age and growth information can be used to improve the profitability of the feeder, then by extension, the feeder would be willing to pay for such information. For instance, live cattle auctions can be described as a common value auction (Coatney et al, 2012). It is a well-established principal in the common value auction literature that bids (price) increase as the noise of the true value's signal is reduced, hence mitigating the winner's curse (Krishna, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parcell, Schroeder, and Hiner (1995) found a positive relationship between price and dressing percentage but did not control for body weight. Coatney, Shaffer, and Menkhaus (2012) found a positive relationship between body weight and price for slaughter cows. As such, the BF's expected salvage value is expected to increase with increasing body weight.…”
Section: Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where the subset of observable characteristics to the buyer impacting salvage value is ω i K i , as well as their corresponding expected implicit marginal values ν paid by slaughter cow buyers. Examples of important salvage value characteristics are health, weight, and breed type that impact expected dressing percentage and subsequent red meat yield (Mintert et al, 1990;Coatney, Shaffer, and Menkhaus, 2012). In all, the buyers' perceived total marginal value product of any characteristic's contribution to the NPV is a complicated relationship of various characteristic combinations, some of which may simultaneously impact the buyers' expected returns, production costs, and salvage value.…”
Section: Conceptual Asset Value Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation