2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auctions for quota: A primer and perspectives for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the allocation of catch shares has always been a challenging policy problem (Rosenberg 2017, Lynham 2014). There is an active discussion about market-based solutions for the allocation and re-allocation of catch shares (Marszalec 2017, Kominers et al 2017. Unfortunately, the design of such markets is challenging as complex constraints need to be considered in practice.…”
Section: Exchanges For Fishery Access Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the allocation of catch shares has always been a challenging policy problem (Rosenberg 2017, Lynham 2014). There is an active discussion about market-based solutions for the allocation and re-allocation of catch shares (Marszalec 2017, Kominers et al 2017. Unfortunately, the design of such markets is challenging as complex constraints need to be considered in practice.…”
Section: Exchanges For Fishery Access Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AB or ABC) in order for the auctions to allocate quota efficiently (Porter et al, 2003;Kwasnica et al, 2005;Cramton et al, 2006;Brunner et al, 2010). 11 For example, Marszalec (2018a) discusses how different types of sealed-bid combinatorial auctions for indivisible goods could be applied to sell ITQs. 12 But since quota is, in principle, divisible, an alternative approach is to allow bidders to bid for combinatorial shares (Wilson, 1979;Klemperer, 2010).…”
Section: (I) Allocation Of Itqsmentioning
confidence: 99%