“…4 Recently, Fischer, Güth, Kaplan, and Zultan (2021) compared the effects of spying in first-and second-price auctions, using the same framework as in Arozamena and Weinschelbaum (2009), where a corrupt auctioneer leaks a rival's bid to a favored bidder. However, while Arozamena and Weinschelbaum (2009) consider only a first-price auction, and show that leaked information does not affect the behavior of the spied at bidder, the main focus of Fischer, Güth, Kaplan, and Zultan (2021) is the role of behavioral assumptions in second-price auctions and their testing in a controlled lab experiment. 5 Of course, spying in second-price auctions can only make a difference if bidders do not play the weakly dominant strategy of truthful bidding and instead engage in spiteful bidding or abstain from bidding if they see no chance to win.…”