Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis

Abstract

BackgroundElected officials (e.g., legislators) are an important but understudied population in dissemination research. Audience segmentation is essential in developing dissemination strategies that are tailored for legislators with different characteristics, but sophisticated audience segmentation analyses have not been conducted with this population. An empirical clustering audience segmentation study was conducted to (1) identify behavioral health (i.e., mental health and substance abuse) audience segments among US state legislators, (2) identify legislator characteristics that are predictive of segment membership, and (3) determine whether segment membership is predictive of support for state behavioral health parity laws.MethodsLatent class analysis (LCA) was used. Data were from a multi-modal (post-mail, e-mail, telephone) survey of state legislators fielded in 2017 (N = 475). Nine variables were included in the LCA (e.g., perceptions of behavioral health treatment effectiveness, mental illness stigma). Binary logistic regression tested associations between legislator characteristics (e.g., political party, gender, ideology) and segment membership. Multi-level logistic regression assessed the predictive validity of segment membership on support for parity laws. A name was developed for each segment that captured its most salient features.ResultsThree audience segments were identified. Budget-oriented skeptics with stigma (47% of legislators) had the least faith in behavioral health treatment effectiveness, had the most mental illness stigma, and were most influenced by budget impact. This segment was predominantly male, Republican, and ideologically conservative. Action-oriented supporters (24%) were most likely to have introduced a behavioral health bill, most likely to identify behavioral health issues as policy priorities, and most influenced by research evidence. This was the most politically and ideologically diverse segment. Passive supporters (29%) had the greatest faith in treatment effectiveness and the least stigma, but were also least likely to have introduced a behavioral health bill. Segment membership was a stronger predictor of support for parity laws than almost all other legislator characteristics.ConclusionsState legislators are a heterogeneous audience when it comes to behavioral health. There is a need to develop and test behavioral health evidence dissemination strategies that are tailored for legislators in different audience segments. Empirical clustering approaches to audience segmentation are a potentially valuable tool for dissemination science.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0816-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cancer stigma and cancer screening attendance: a population based survey in England

“…To our knowledge, no other studies have explicitly examined gender differences in public cancer stigma, although two studies in university student samples suggest that women are less likely than men to distance themselves from patients with cancer or refuse to help them [35, 36]. The finding that cancer stigma is higher in men is also consistent with a study about mental health stigma among US legislators that found that men were overrepresented among legislators with high levels of stigma (84% male versus 75% of all legislators included in the study) [37].…”

State Legislators’ Support for Behavioral Health Parity Laws: The Influence of Mutable and Fixed Factors at Multiple Levels

“…These findings suggest that the dissemination of evidence concerning C‐SBHPL, and potentially other evidence‐based behavioral health policies, should target mutable characteristics, as they might precede changes in policy support and, ultimately, policy adoption. Tailoring materials to be disseminated to ideologically conservative, moderate, and liberal legislators might also be beneficial …”

“…We calculated the nonresponse weights and applied them to adjust for these differences using a sample poststratification approach in which weighting classes were based on the full sample frame . The weights accounted for differences between the respondents and nonrespondents in gender, geographic region, and political party and have been used in previous analyses of the survey data set …”

Dissemination Science in School Mental Health: A Framework for Future Research

“…As mentioned previously, dissemination strategies should be tailored to specific target stakeholders. The rationale for this is based in “audience segmentation,” which states that tailoring communication to groups who are similar to one another with regard to beliefs, identities, values, and roles will improve the effectiveness of dissemination (Purtle et al, 2018 ; Slater, 1996 ). Here, we briefly discuss different groups of individuals who play a role in disseminating school-based mental health services, how they are embedded in various contexts, their roles as change agents, and the specific behaviors they are in a position to engage in to support EBP implementation as part of routine school practice (see Table 1 ).…”