2005
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.014266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audio computer assisted interviewing to measure HIV risk behaviours in a clinic population

Abstract: Objectives: To examine whether audio computer assisted survey interviewing (ACASI) influenced responses to sensitive HIV risk behaviour questions, relative to interviewer administration of those questions (IAQ), among patients attending a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic and whether the impact of interview mode on reporting of risk behaviours was homogeneous across subgroups of patients (defined by age, sex, and previous STI clinic experience). Methods: 1350 clinic patients were assigned to complete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research in North Carolina documented that young men newly diagnosed with HIV were more likely to accurately disclose the gender of their sexual partners during postdiagnosis partner notification and referral services interviews than during pretest counseling. 15 Additional research has shown that STD clinic patients provide more or different information when completing an audio and computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) than in clinician interviews [16][17][18] suggesting that a face-to-face, counselor implemented HIV counseling risk assessment may also be incomplete.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Hiv Counseling Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research in North Carolina documented that young men newly diagnosed with HIV were more likely to accurately disclose the gender of their sexual partners during postdiagnosis partner notification and referral services interviews than during pretest counseling. 15 Additional research has shown that STD clinic patients provide more or different information when completing an audio and computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) than in clinician interviews [16][17][18] suggesting that a face-to-face, counselor implemented HIV counseling risk assessment may also be incomplete.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Hiv Counseling Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on serostatus disclosure and unprotected sex, based as they often are on participant self-report without substantiation from partners, may be subject to recall and social desirability biases. We stressed participant confidentiality and used an ACASI to help minimize these biases 56,57 but it is still possible that people overreported disclosure and under-reported unprotected sexual activity. The question used to operationalize serostatus disclosure was purposely designed to be double-barreled, which participants could have misinterpreted.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative interview formats have been tested in an attempt to reduce this bias, including audio-computer-assisted self-interviews (ACASI), informal confidential voting interviews (ICVI), and self-administered questionnaires (SAQ). Using these more impersonal interview techniques, it has been found that women's odds of reporting multiple sexual partners are between 1.0 and 5.2 times those reported in FTFIs (Ghanem et al 2005;Kissinger et al 1999;Rogers et al 2005;Gregson et al 2004;Gregson et al 2002), with this multiple being considerably higher in married women than in unmarried women (Gregson et al 2002). Men's odds of reporting multiple partners in the more impersonal interview formats are between 1.1 and 1.7 times those in FTFIs (Ghanem et al 2005;Rogers et al 2005;Gregson et al 2004;Gregson et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual behaviour data have traditionally been captured in face-to-face interviews (FTFIs), but such interviews have been shown to elicit significantly lower reported numbers of sexual partners when compared with recently developed interview formats that are more impersonal and anonymous (Ghanem et al 2005;Kissinger et al 1999;Rogers et al 2005;Mensch, Hewett, and Erulkar 2003;Gregson et al 2004). Studies have also shown that prompting individuals with additional questions can lead to enhanced recall of past sexual relationships (Brewer et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%