2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audio-visual synchrony and spatial attention enhance processing of dynamic visual stimulation independently and in parallel: A frequency-tagging study

Abstract: Audio-visual synchrony and spatial attention enhance processing of dynamic visual stimulation independently and in parallel: A frequencytagging study. NeuroImage, (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.022) This is the author's final accepted version.There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/145770/ This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publicati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not clear how these cross-trial influences occur, but in a broad sense, they are in line with the idea that audiovisual interactions can occur at multiple stages of sensory processing (Cappe et al, 2009;Koelewijn et al, 2010). Hence, while the observed data might show a potential role of the direct visualto-auditory influences at peripheral locations in multisensory processing, the observed cross-trial dependencies of visual-toauditory benefits to trials with static stimuli might also rely on contributions of higher association cortices in the brain (Covic et al, 2017). As in our experiment design, the (in)congruent modulated and static stimuli are presented randomly in a staircase design with varying intensity of stimuli, we are unable to comment on the nature of serial interactions extending over trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is not clear how these cross-trial influences occur, but in a broad sense, they are in line with the idea that audiovisual interactions can occur at multiple stages of sensory processing (Cappe et al, 2009;Koelewijn et al, 2010). Hence, while the observed data might show a potential role of the direct visualto-auditory influences at peripheral locations in multisensory processing, the observed cross-trial dependencies of visual-toauditory benefits to trials with static stimuli might also rely on contributions of higher association cortices in the brain (Covic et al, 2017). As in our experiment design, the (in)congruent modulated and static stimuli are presented randomly in a staircase design with varying intensity of stimuli, we are unable to comment on the nature of serial interactions extending over trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…They were likely masked by the broad alpha peak (Fig. 2; Covic et al, 2017). Note that this is a result of the relatively low-intensity stimulation used here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of attention on SSR-evoked power and ITC are typically interchangeable (Covic et al, 2017; Keitel et al, 2017a). In fact, increased ITC, or phase synchronization, has been considered the primary effect of attention on stimulus-driven periodic brain responses (Kim et al, 2007; Kranczioch, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others were changed or simplified over time. Because language such an important form of communication, some people study other languages to be able to speak and write in them other than their own [14,15,16].…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%