Audiological profile of patients with SARS-Co-V-2 PCR-positive cases

Daikhes, N. A.; Карнеева, О. В.; Machalov, A. S.; Kuznetcov, A O; Sapozhnikov, Ya. M.; Balakina, A. V.; Khulugurova, L N; Karpov, V L

doi:10.17116/otorino2020850516

Cited by 24 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There were two international studies [18,33] and one regional study in Europe [41]. All the studies were in English, except one which was in Russian [32]. A translated copy was obtained to include in this review.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies reported an equal gender divide, and others reported variable ratios, such as Munro et al [44] reporting 88% and Viola et al [47] reporting 67% of the participants were males, as seen in Table 3. One study included other genders [33] (e.g., nonbinary and cisgender), and another study did not report the prevalence of symptoms in males and females [32]. The number of patients included ranged from 6 to 1420 in these studies, with most being conducted in Europe followed by Asia.…”

Section: Quality Analysis Of Case Reportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were six studies from Asia reporting from India [45,46], Pakistan [36], Turkey [49][50][51], and China [42]. The three additional studies were located in Russia [32]; Egypt [37]; and internationally, including the USA, UK, Northern Ireland, France, Canada, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland, Sweden, and other countries [18,33].…”

Section: Quality Analysis Of Case Reportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies were both retrospective (e.g., Elibol [34], Lechien et al [41], Liang et al [42], Klopfenstein et al [39], and Zayet et al [48]) and prospective observational studies (e.g., Daikhes et al [32], Karadaş and Sonkaya [38], Özçelik Korkmaz et al [40], and Swain and Pani [46]). Data collection was completed via verbal questioning during ear, nose, and throat (ENT) examinations for all of the included studies.…”

Section: Study Designs and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sources of heterogeneity included different tinnitus reporting criteria, age groups, and study focus. Two studies included control groups, namely, Daikhes et al [32], who had 30 controls included, and Freni et al [35], who had 20 controls with no history of hearing loss or tinnitus. Zayet et al [48] included a control group who had Influenza and no COVID-19 symptoms.…”

Section: Study Designs and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Beukes

Ulep

Eubank

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review aimed to systematically review what has been published regarding tinnitus during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic up to March 2021 by performing both narrative and quantitative meta-analyses. Of the 181 records identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria, which generally had a fair risk of overall bias. In the included, 28 studies focused on the impact of the COVID-19 virus on tinnitus and 5 studies focused on the impact of the pandemic on tinnitus. From the studies identifying the impact of COVID-19 on tinnitus, there were 17 cross-sectional studies (n = 8913) and 11 case series or case report studies (n = 35). There were 2 cross-sectional studies (n = 3232) and 3 pre-post-test design studies (n = 326) focusing on the impact of the pandemic on tinnitus. No consistent patterns were found regarding the presentation of the tinnitus or additional factors that could have tinnitus developing in the disease impact studies. For the pandemic impact studies, the associated stress and anxiety of the pandemic were consistently suggested to contribute to tinnitus experiences. The pooled estimated prevalence of tinnitus post COVID-19 was 8% (CI: 5 to 13%). Medical professionals should be aware that tinnitus might be more problematic following the pandemic or after having COVID-19.

show abstract

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Analysis Of Case Reportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Analysis Of Case Reportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Designs and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Designs and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Beukes

Ulep

Eubank

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison of pure tone audiometry thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) of patients with and without Covid-19 pneumonia

Yıldız¹

2022

American Journal of Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the new coronavirus that starts similar to an upper respiratory tract infection and causes death by causing pneumonia and vasculopathy. Many viral infections are known to cause hearing loss. In this study, pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds and Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) results were compared across patients with COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 pneumonia, and control group patients. Methods The study included 240 patients in the age range of 18–50 years. The patients were divided into three groups of 80 patients as the control (no disease), COVID-19 (nonpneumonia), Covid-19 (pneumonia) groups. PTA and TEOAE tests were performed on the control group patients and the results were recorded. PTA and TEOAE tests were performed in the COVID-19 groups in the first and third months after the infection ended. Each test was performed twice; the results were recorded, and the mean of the two results was calculated. Results PTA results and TEOAE amplitudes in the first and third months were not significantly different between the COVID-19 non-pneumonia group and the control group ( p > 0.05), between the COVID-19 pneumonia group and the control group (p > 0.05), and between the COVID-19 non-pneumonia group and the COVID-19 pneumonia group ( p > 0.05). Conclusions Despite minimal impairment and minimal amplitude decreases in patients, who recovered from COVID-19, such changes were found to become restored in the third month. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed to indicate COVID-19- associated hearing loss.

show abstract

Does coronavirus disease 2019 affect peripheral and central auditory systems? Matched group cross-sectional study and six-month follow up

Deniz-Sakarya,

Yorulmaz

2024

J. Laryngol. Otol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study aimed to compare the peripheral-to-central auditory systems of people with coronavirus disease 2019 to a well-matched control group and examine the long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 on the auditory system. Method Participants who were outpatients of coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 30) were compared with a well-matched control group (n = 30). Behavioural and electrophysiological tests were performed, and tests were repeated at six months in the coronavirus disease 2019 group. Results Statistically significant differences were observed in the right ear at 10 kHz (p = 0.007) and 12.5 kHz (p = 0.028), and in the left ear at 10 kHz (p = 0.040) and 12.5 kHz (p = 0.040) between groups. The groups had no difference regarding the other audiological test results (p > 0.05). Conclusion Extended high-frequency thresholds were affected in the coronavirus disease 2019 patients. No other findings indicated that the peripheral-to-central auditory system was affected. The effect on extended high-frequency thresholds appeared permanent, but no clinically significant new, late-onset auditory system effects were observed.

show abstract

Audiological profile of patients with SARS-Co-V-2 PCR-positive cases

Cited by 24 publications

References 11 publications

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

The Impact of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Comparison of pure tone audiometry thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) of patients with and without Covid-19 pneumonia

Does coronavirus disease 2019 affect peripheral and central auditory systems? Matched group cross-sectional study and six-month follow up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About