2006
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20061164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audiomagnetotelluric data from Spring, Cave, and Coyote Spring Valleys, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, electromagnetic techniques infer subsurface ER from measurements of natural geomagnetic and geoelectric field variations at the ground surface [73,74]. In particular, VLF-EM and low-frequency MTS use a fixed grounded dipole or horizontal loop as an artificial signal source to determine ER [75,76]. Both natural and controlled-source electromagnetic signals are used to obtain 1D ER models beneath the measurement site [77].…”
Section: Electromagnetic Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, electromagnetic techniques infer subsurface ER from measurements of natural geomagnetic and geoelectric field variations at the ground surface [73,74]. In particular, VLF-EM and low-frequency MTS use a fixed grounded dipole or horizontal loop as an artificial signal source to determine ER [75,76]. Both natural and controlled-source electromagnetic signals are used to obtain 1D ER models beneath the measurement site [77].…”
Section: Electromagnetic Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both natural and controlled-source electromagnetic signals are used to obtain 1D ER models beneath the measurement site [77]. The ER dataset at the corresponding depths and signal-source distances are mathematically inverted to produce a 2D ER model [75,77].…”
Section: Electromagnetic Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%