2023
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2022.66990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audiometric Evaluation of the Relationship between Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Chronic Glaucoma

Abstract: Objectives: To assess hearing function in chronic glaucoma patients in comparison to healthy individuals. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 24 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients (24 ears) and 22 pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEG) patients (22 ears) who were followed for at least 5 years in the Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Ophthalmology Department, as well as 21 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals (21 ears, control gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Gülyeşil et al compared HL in XFG, POAG and age–sex matched controls. XFG patients had significantly higher hearing thresholds at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 kHz ( p < 0.05) compared to controls and higher hearing threshold at 8 kHz compared to the POAG group ( p = 0.002) [ 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Gülyeşil et al compared HL in XFG, POAG and age–sex matched controls. XFG patients had significantly higher hearing thresholds at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 kHz ( p < 0.05) compared to controls and higher hearing threshold at 8 kHz compared to the POAG group ( p = 0.002) [ 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, Gülyeşil FF et al compared HL in the POAG, XFG and control groups, indicating that hearing thresholds were higher in the POAG and XFG groups compared to control group [ 75 ]. In particular, POAG patients had significantly higher hearing thresholds at 0.5 kHz ( p = 0.011) and 1 kHz ( p = 0.003) compared to the control group [ 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations