1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4254(99)00015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit committee activity and agency costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
163
5
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
163
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the increase in size, the type of auditor (leader or not), the auditor tenure and the presence of large sharesholders exert a significant and positive influence on the disappearance of avoidable qualifications. This is also in accordance with the findings of previous studies on Anglo-Saxon companies, such as Menon and Williams (1994), Deli and Gillan (2000) and Klein (2002a) for the case of size, and Collier and Gregory (1999) for the case of the type of auditor. Some of these studies (Deli and Gillan 2000;Collier and Gregory 1999) found that the effect of firm leverage is significant, whereas we do not find such an effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the increase in size, the type of auditor (leader or not), the auditor tenure and the presence of large sharesholders exert a significant and positive influence on the disappearance of avoidable qualifications. This is also in accordance with the findings of previous studies on Anglo-Saxon companies, such as Menon and Williams (1994), Deli and Gillan (2000) and Klein (2002a) for the case of size, and Collier and Gregory (1999) for the case of the type of auditor. Some of these studies (Deli and Gillan 2000;Collier and Gregory 1999) found that the effect of firm leverage is significant, whereas we do not find such an effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The majority of these studies, mainly of Anglo-Saxon origin, investigate the different factors which affect the efficacy of ACs and usually focus their analysis on listed companies. Different approaches have been used to study AC efficacy, including: (a) linking the ACs considered to be effective with certain corporate characteristics (Menon and Williams 1994;Collier and Gregory 1999;Deli and Gillan 2000;Klein 2002b); (b) determining the most important functions performed by the AC or what features should it have (Kalbers 1992;Kalbers and Fogarty 1993); (c) investigating the relation between the work of the AC and the auditor (Knapp 1987;Abbott and Parker 2000;Raghunandan 2001;Dezoort et al 2003; assessing whether the presence of an AC affects the reliability of financial reporting (Mcmullen 1996;Lin et al 2006;Jaggi and Leung 2007) as well as the extent of voluntary information released by the company (Ho and Wong 2001 and (e) examining whether the specific characteristics of an AC affect its efficacy.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency costs are expected to be higher when senior management's shareholdings are proportionately lower because this results in less alignment of shareholder and management interests (Ettredge et al, 1994;Menon and Williams, 1994). They are also expected to be higher when there is a smaller concentration of large shareholders as these shareholders can more directly monitor the activities of management (Collier and Gregory, 1999). A higher level of debt increases agency costs (Watts and Zimmerman, 1986;Chow, 1982;Jensen and Meckling, 1976) because of the incentives for managers to transfer wealth from debtholders to shareholders (Klein, 2002;Ettredge et al, 1994;Bradbury, 1990).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with agency theory and the monitoring of firms, prior studies have found a relationship between high quality auditing firms, leverage and audit committee activity (Collier & Gregory, 1999). In this study it is a dummy variable taken as 1 if the accounting firm used is a high quality "Big Six" international auditing firm.…”
Section: Auditing Firmmentioning
confidence: 72%