2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7063(03)00004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit firm size, public ownership, and firms' discretionary accruals management

Abstract: Francis et al. (1999) and Becker et al. (1998) report evidence that audit quality acts as a constraint on both income-increasing and income-decreasing earnings management in public firms. These results raise several interesting questions. First, are incentives for and constraints on earnings management independent of whether earnings are above or below target? Second, does audit quality also restrain earnings management in private firms as it does in public firms? Third, does public ownership itself act as a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of quality differentiation between audit firms contradicts results from previous studies on U.S. public companies (Becker et al, 1998, Francis et al, 1999DeFond et al, 2002;Li, 2009). However, the results concur with findings conducted on private firms in Belgium (Vander Bauwhede et al, 2003;Vander Bauwhede and Willekens, 2004). A marginally negative association is even found between PERCQUAL and BIG4 in models 4 and 5.…”
Section: Nas and Audit Qualitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The absence of quality differentiation between audit firms contradicts results from previous studies on U.S. public companies (Becker et al, 1998, Francis et al, 1999DeFond et al, 2002;Li, 2009). However, the results concur with findings conducted on private firms in Belgium (Vander Bauwhede et al, 2003;Vander Bauwhede and Willekens, 2004). A marginally negative association is even found between PERCQUAL and BIG4 in models 4 and 5.…”
Section: Nas and Audit Qualitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Of these findings we note that in the industrial Tunisian context, the belonging of an auditor to a "Big 4" allows to restrict a down earnings management. This result, obtained for Tunisian firms, joined these of Becker, DeFond, Jiambalvo, &Subramanyam (1998) obtained for U.S. firms andVander Bauwhede et al (2003) obtained for Belgian firms. Indeed, these authors studied the effect of the auditor reputation measured by their belonging to a "Big 6" (in the past) on the intensity of earnings management as measured by the absolute value of discretionary accruals.…”
Section: The Cross Effect Of the External Audit Quality And The Capitsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, they find a higher coefficient of results relevance of firms audited by "Big 4" than for customers of none "Big 4". The hypothesis related to the impact of audit quality on earnings management is also tested in the Belgian context (Vander Bauwhede, Willekens, & Gaeremynck, 2003); in Korea (Jeong & Rho, 2004) and in French (Piot & Janin, 2004).…”
Section: External Auditor Reputation and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnedo et al, 2007;Leuz et al, 2003;Marques, Lima Rodrigues, & Craig, 2011;Othman & Zeghal, 2006;Vander Bauwhede et al, 2003), our results show that managers of companies near to bankruptcy prefer to increase earnings because firms need to look better than they actually are and avoid and/or postpone the risk of an involvement in a bankruptcy procedure. They would also indicate that, during financial distress situations, managers of non-listed companies operating in a code law setting behave in a similar way as firms do in other contexts, given that our evidence is consistent with Rosner (2003), who reaches the same conclusion using a different methodology with a different institutional setting and sample (USA and public companies).…”
Section: Spanish Journal Of Finance and Accounting 11mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Ball & Shivakumar, 2005;Beatty & Harris, 1999) and in code law institutional settings (e.g. Arnedo et al, 2007;Vander Bauwhede, Willekens, & Gaeremynck, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%