1993
DOI: 10.1177/026921639300700307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit of neural blockade for palliative care patients in an acute unit

Abstract: During the period from September 1990 to March 1992, 155 nerve blocks were performed for 125 patients as part of the clinical management of pain due to malignant disease. The efficacy, in terms of pain score reduction, and spontaneously reported side effects secondary to these procedures were prospectively audited. Neural blockade was undertaken in accordance with strict clinical criteria, and medication was optimized with the aim of achieving maximum analgesia with minimum side effects at all times. Pain was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many minor procedures that do not require the availability of radiography may be undertaken in a hospice setting. 3 Well-localized pain can be relieved more easily, while large painful areas innervated by multiple nerves may require more central blocks. The following case illustrates the benefits that can occur from a peripheral block in the context of palliative care.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many minor procedures that do not require the availability of radiography may be undertaken in a hospice setting. 3 Well-localized pain can be relieved more easily, while large painful areas innervated by multiple nerves may require more central blocks. The following case illustrates the benefits that can occur from a peripheral block in the context of palliative care.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficacy and safety of neural blockade has been demonstrated in more than 90% of cases, resulting in prolonged pain relief that outlasts the pharmacological action of the drug used. 175 The long-lasting beneficial effects after non-neurolytic blockade can be explained by a prolonged interruption of transmission by afferent somatic and/or sympathetic fibers from the painful area to the central nervous system, interrupting the self-sustaining abnormal stimulation initiated by the chronic pain state. Location and type of pain are of primary importance in considering the patient selection.…”
Section: Regional Anesthetic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little hard evidence from well-constructed clinical trials that favour the use of therapeutic nerve block as a method of treatment. The best examples have been found in neuroly tic blockade for pain arising from cancer (Boys et al, 1993). However, there is always the danger in any destructive or permanent procedure involving damage to the nerves that pain may return because of damage to the existent efferent stump.…”
Section: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Anaesthetic Nerve Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%