2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit of the national meal guidelines for home‐delivered and centre‐based meal programs

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the impact of the National Meal Guidelines on service providers and caterers involved in home-delivered and centre-based meal programs in Australia. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted to explore the uptake of the guidelines by participants and evaluate the impact on their practice. Closed questions were analysed using χ 2 and Fisher's exact tests, while open-ended questions underwent thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results: A total of 101 out of 441 participants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 2530 retrieved studies, 193 were ultimately included 6,7,11–201 . The PRISMA-ScR diagram (Figure 1) shows the study selection process and reasons for full-text exclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 2530 retrieved studies, 193 were ultimately included 6,7,11–201 . The PRISMA-ScR diagram (Figure 1) shows the study selection process and reasons for full-text exclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were currently referring to them. 33 In addition, the release of these new guidelines has helped to raise the profile of nutrition and the benefits of meal services in community-living older adults. Following their release, the Australian Government has pledged an additional $8 million dollars in funding for meal subsidies for home-delivered and centre-based meal programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines have been presented at the Australian MOW Association 2017 national conference, in association with newsletters 31 and annual meeting updates 32 . An initial audit from 101 MOW service participants suggested that the majority (89%) had heard of the guidelines and 69% were currently referring to them 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%