2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit of the two-week pathway for patients with suspected cancer of the head and neck and the influence of socioeconomic status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide [1]. Despite the increasing etiological importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection observed in recent years, the long-lasting history of smoking and alcohol abuse is still the prevailing cause of this cancer, and reflects the lower socioeconomic status of the patients [2]. Consequently, the time from the symptoms' appearance and the first medical consultation is often delayed in these patients [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide [1]. Despite the increasing etiological importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection observed in recent years, the long-lasting history of smoking and alcohol abuse is still the prevailing cause of this cancer, and reflects the lower socioeconomic status of the patients [2]. Consequently, the time from the symptoms' appearance and the first medical consultation is often delayed in these patients [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the time from the symptoms' appearance and the first medical consultation is often delayed in these patients [3]. At presentation, two-thirds of them have a locally advanced disease with associated anatomical abnormalities and functional disorders in the affected area [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one socio-economic variable was selected among the many considered in this study (inemployed, self employed with one parent working), but it was shown that most of the selected variables were correlated with other socio-economic and health factors (Chaturvedi, 2001). Deprivation was found to be not significant, in contrast with the large amount of literature linking deprivation or socio-economic status with cancer diagnosis and survival rates (Liao et al, 2023, Bithell et al, 2013, Chambers et al, 2020, Shack et al, 2008, Edwards et al, 2006, Rogers et al, 2019, Rafiq et al, 2019, Phillips et al, 2019, Taib et al, 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These factors acquired by linking primary and secondary data are: The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for LSOAs in England. Every LSOA in England is ranked from 1 (most deprived or poor) to 5 (quintile) or 10 (decile) (least deprived or most affluent), but there is no definitive cut-off below which an area is considered 'deprived' (Rogers et al, 2019).…”
Section: Exposure and Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review estimated that OPMD has a 12% mean risk of malignant progression [10]. In the UK, it was found that only 7% of OPMD patients, referred using the two-week 'fast-track' suspected cancer referral system, actually developed OSCC [18]. An audit (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012) carried out in a UK district general hospital found a significant 450% increase in the annual number of 'fast-track' referral patients but cancer detection rate decreased by 50% [19] indicating an unnecessary burden on secondary care due to large number of false positives being referred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%