2011
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v19i1.2152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit Sampling Methods And Juror Negligence Awards: An Expectation Gap?

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both judgmental and snowball sampling techniques were used as this generally provides higher quality of data (Gilbertson and Herron, 2011). The criteria for choosing the interviewees were: (a) years working for the same organisation (before and after 2008), (b) position in the organisation, and (c) wider working experience.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both judgmental and snowball sampling techniques were used as this generally provides higher quality of data (Gilbertson and Herron, 2011). The criteria for choosing the interviewees were: (a) years working for the same organisation (before and after 2008), (b) position in the organisation, and (c) wider working experience.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%