2013
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872dd2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Abstract: The NIH Toolbox project has assembled measurement tools to assess a wide range of human perception and ability across the lifespan. As part of this initiative, a small but comprehensive battery of auditory tests has been assembled. The main tool of this battery, pure-tone thresholds, measures the ability of people to hear at specific frequencies. Pure-tone thresholds have long been considered the "gold standard" of auditory testing, and are normally obtained in a clinical setting by highly trained audiologists… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many individual participants had changes of at least 4 words the day after noise exposure (Figure 5A ), but not 1-week later (Figure 5E ). The WIN should be considered for use in future studies not only based on the availability of the validated test as part of the NIH Toolbox (Zecker et al, 2013 ), but also based on the sensitivity of the test to acute, noise-induced changes in study participants. It may be the case that even greater sensitivity could be achieved in tests completed with higher background noise levels, or perhaps modifications (such as those of Liberman et al, 2016 ) that more appropriately reflect and reproduce the difficult listening environments found in real-world noisy and reverberative environments, such as restaurants, gymnasiums, bars, clubs, and other common venues with significant background noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many individual participants had changes of at least 4 words the day after noise exposure (Figure 5A ), but not 1-week later (Figure 5E ). The WIN should be considered for use in future studies not only based on the availability of the validated test as part of the NIH Toolbox (Zecker et al, 2013 ), but also based on the sensitivity of the test to acute, noise-induced changes in study participants. It may be the case that even greater sensitivity could be achieved in tests completed with higher background noise levels, or perhaps modifications (such as those of Liberman et al, 2016 ) that more appropriately reflect and reproduce the difficult listening environments found in real-world noisy and reverberative environments, such as restaurants, gymnasiums, bars, clubs, and other common venues with significant background noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study 1 child participants completed the NIH Toolbox Emotional Support scale, Maternal Relationships scale, and Paternal Relationships scale [34]. Study 2 parent participants completed the FACES IV balanced cohesion and flexibility subscales [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of audiology, PTT testing has been called the ''gold standard'' for the assessment of the ability to hear (Sindhusake et al, 2001;Shargorodsky et al, 2010;Kiely et al, 2012;Baiduc et al, 2013;Zecker et al, 2013). A gold standard or reference standard should be clearly described to allow for replication.…”
Section: Ptts As the ''Gold Standard'' For The Validity Of Self-repormentioning
confidence: 99%