2010
DOI: 10.1177/10298649100140s213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditive analysis of the Quartetto per Archi in due tempi (1955) by Bruno Maderna

Abstract: People very often ask me questions about form. They expect me to talk about mathematical formulae, a bit like I do with spectrum; it's easy with spectrum, but not with time. I find it impossible to use the same form for different pieces: every musical work is a new experience of time. It's for this reason that I can't explain it beforehand... because for me, explaining the form of a piece is the same as listening to it. Talking about form when we are dealing with listening, is simply a pleonasm.... it doesn't … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous experimental studies, we analyzed how the listeners (musicians and non-musicians) memorize the overall structure of post-tonal music during listening in real time (Addessi and Caterina, 2005; Addessi, 2010). We observed that the perception of “prominent features” allowed the listeners to perceive several points of segmentations, to divide the piece into the main sections and consequently, to memorize the overall structure of the musical piece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous experimental studies, we analyzed how the listeners (musicians and non-musicians) memorize the overall structure of post-tonal music during listening in real time (Addessi and Caterina, 2005; Addessi, 2010). We observed that the perception of “prominent features” allowed the listeners to perceive several points of segmentations, to divide the piece into the main sections and consequently, to memorize the overall structure of the musical piece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%