2016
DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2016.1222151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditor flow and financial statement comparability: Evidence from audit firm mergers in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noted that there is a positive and significant relationship between the differences in leverage and differences in DAs since the coefficient of Diff_Lev is 0.6374 and the p-value < 0.05. This result contradicts with findings of some studies (Cao et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2020;Francis et al, 2014;Jiu et al, 2020;Kawada, 2014;Mohseni et al, 2014). However, from the researcher's viewpoint, it is more logical that the relation between the differences in leverage and differences in DAs to be positive, since the lower the differences in leverage between firm-pairs, the lower the differences in their DAs, in turn.…”
Section: Results Of the Firm Characteristics Moderating Modelscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is also noted that there is a positive and significant relationship between the differences in leverage and differences in DAs since the coefficient of Diff_Lev is 0.6374 and the p-value < 0.05. This result contradicts with findings of some studies (Cao et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2020;Francis et al, 2014;Jiu et al, 2020;Kawada, 2014;Mohseni et al, 2014). However, from the researcher's viewpoint, it is more logical that the relation between the differences in leverage and differences in DAs to be positive, since the lower the differences in leverage between firm-pairs, the lower the differences in their DAs, in turn.…”
Section: Results Of the Firm Characteristics Moderating Modelscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…It is also noted that there is a positive and significant relationship between the differences in firm size and differences in DAs since the coefficient of Diff_Size is 0.3805 and the p-value < 0.05. This result is consistent with Cao et al (2016) while contradicts with findings of some studies (Chen et al, 2020;Francis et al, 2014;Jiu et al, 2020;Kawada, 2014;Mohseni et al, 2014). Accordingly, the evidenced negative and significant effect of the interaction between the firm size and audit style is logical and as expected, since if firm-pairs are audited by the same audit firm, and have lower 2 According to Pallant (2016), if the largest Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) value is greater than 10, the model would be subject to multi-collinearity problem, i.e., high correlations between independent variables.…”
Section: Results Of the Firm Characteristics Moderating Modelscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations